Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
This bill reauthorizes and expands the National Quantum Initiative, updating definitions, purposes, and governance.
It creates or enlarges programs at NIST, NSF, DOE, and NASA (centers, testbeds, foundries, workforce hubs), requires an international cooperation strategy, and strengthens research security and post-quantum cryptography activities.
It adds restrictions on funding relationships with Confucius Institutes and certain foreign countries or entities of concern, and extends the program sunset date.
Content is largely technical, pro-competitiveness, and security-focused—areas that often win bipartisan backing—yet scale, appropriation needs, and foreign-restriction clauses introduce moderate risk.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive reauthorization and expansion of the National Quantum Initiative Act that provides clear policy objectives, numerous definitional updates, assigned implementing authorities, and specific program architectures, while leaving significant implementation detail (notably explicit funding authorizations and granular performance metrics) to executive agencies and future appropriations.
Research-security and foreign-collaboration limits versus open academic exchange
Research-security and foreign-collaboration limits versus open academic exchange
Likely broadly supportive because the bill funds public research, workforce development, and equity-focused STEM programs.
Supporters would welcome testbeds, community-college partnerships, and post-quantum cryptography assistance for critical infrastructure.
They would express concerns about research-security provisions and foreign-entity restrictions potentially chilling academic collaboration and would press for explicit protections for academic freedom and civil liberties.
Generally supportive as a pragmatic, competitiveness-and-security measure that updates federal coordination and standards.
Appreciates interagency planning, international strategy, and supply-chain focus.
Wants clearer budget, measurable goals, timelines, and processes to avoid duplication and excessive bureaucracy.
Likely cautiously supportive on national security, supply-chain, and foreign-entity restrictions; those provisions align with security priorities.
Skeptical about expanded federal programs, new centers, recurring spending, and regulatory reach into industry.
Wants emphasis on private-sector partnerships, limited bureaucracy, and fiscal restraint.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is largely technical, pro-competitiveness, and security-focused—areas that often win bipartisan backing—yet scale, appropriation needs, and foreign-restriction clauses introduce moderate risk.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Research-security and foreign-collaboration limits versus open academic exchange
Content is largely technical, pro-competitiveness, and security-focused—areas that often win bipartisan backing—yet scale, appropriation ne…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive reauthorization and expansion of the National Quantum Initiative Act that provides clear policy objectives, numerous definitional updat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.