Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
The bill repeals ten specified formula grant programs in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (Title I–VI programs) effective October 1, 2025, and directs the Department of Education to award annual block grants to each State equal to amounts each State received under those provisions in FY2025, beginning in FY2026. "State" is defined to include the 50 States, DC, and Puerto Rico. Funding is provided "except as otherwise appropriated by Congress."
Progressives emphasize harm to vulnerable students and lost protections
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly framed substantive change that repeals specified ESEA formula grant authorities and replaces them with State block grants based on FY2025 distributions, but it lacks detailed operational, fiscal, transitional, and accountability provisions that would ordinarily accompany a sustained reorganization of multiple federal programs.
The bill repeals ten specified formula grant programs in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (Title I–VI programs) effective October 1, 2025, and directs the Department of Education to award annual block grants to each State equal to amounts each State received under those provisions in FY2025, beginning in FY2026. "State" is defined to include the 50 States, DC, and Puerto Rico.
Funding is provided "except as otherwise appropriated by Congress."
Ambitious, partisan-leaning restructuring of federal education programs with limited compromise elements makes enactment unlikely without major amendment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly framed substantive change that repeals specified ESEA formula grant authorities and replaces them with State block grants based on FY2025 distributions, but it lacks detailed operational, fiscal, transitional, and accountability provisions that would ordinarily accompany a sustained reorganization of multiple federal programs.
Progressives emphasize harm to vulnerable students and lost protections
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize harm to vulnerable students and lost protections
Likely to oppose the bill overall.
They would view the repeal of targeted Title I–VI formula programs as removing protections and dedicated services for low-income, English learner, migrant, Indian, and other vulnerable students.
Some flexibility is acknowledged but seen as insufficient without safeguards.
Mixed stance: appreciates reduction in federal fragmentation and potential for local control, but concerned about losing targeted services and accountability.
Would seek evidence and guardrails to ensure vulnerable students aren't harmed and that funding remains sufficient and transparent.
Likely to support the bill.
It aligns with preferences for state control, reduced federal strings, and consolidation of federal programs.
Viewed as returning discretion to states to set education priorities and cut federal compliance costs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Ambitious, partisan-leaning restructuring of federal education programs with limited compromise elements makes enactment unlikely without major amendment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize harm to vulnerable students and lost protections
Ambitious, partisan-leaning restructuring of federal education programs with limited compromise elements makes enactment unlikely without m…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly framed substantive change that repeals specified ESEA formula grant authorities and replaces them with State block grants based on FY2025 distrib…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.