Received in the Senate.
The bill directs the Secretary of Commerce, through the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, to study national security risks and cybersecurity vulnerabilities posed by consumer routers, modems, and combined modem-router devices that are designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to influence of a covered country (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872(f)(2)). The Secretary must consult within the Department of Commerce and deliver a report to relevant Congressional committees within one year of enactment.
Libs push for consumer remediation and civil-liberties safeguards
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑focused study mandate with clear subject matter and a concrete reporting deadline, but it provides limited procedural and resourcing detail necessary for thorough execution.
The bill directs the Secretary of Commerce, through the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, to study national security risks and cybersecurity vulnerabilities posed by consumer routers, modems, and combined modem-router devices that are designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to influence of a covered country (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872(f)(2)).
The Secretary must consult within the Department of Commerce and deliver a report to relevant Congressional committees within one year of enactment.
The statute requires only a study and report; it does not mandate regulatory action or appropriate funding.
Low-cost, narrowly tailored national-security study is plausibly acceptable to many Members, but it still requires Senate action and signature.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑focused study mandate with clear subject matter and a concrete reporting deadline, but it provides limited procedural and resourcing detail necessary for thorough execution.
Libs push for consumer remediation and civil-liberties safeguards
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Libs push for consumer remediation and civil-liberties safeguards
Likely supportive of the study as a prudent, evidence-building step to protect national security and consumer privacy.
Views the bill as a precursor to stronger supply-chain and security measures, while wanting protections for civil liberties and consumers.
Generally favorable to an evidence-based study that clarifies risks before policymaking.
Sees this as a measured, bipartisan approach but wants clear scope, interagency consultation, and cost implications included.
Supportive of assessing national-security risks from foreign-influenced equipment, but cautious about federal overreach and economic impacts.
Accepts a study, but prefers market-based remedies and clear protections for trade and property rights.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, narrowly tailored national-security study is plausibly acceptable to many Members, but it still requires Senate action and signature.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Libs push for consumer remediation and civil-liberties safeguards
Low-cost, narrowly tailored national-security study is plausibly acceptable to many Members, but it still requires Senate action and signat…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑focused study mandate with clear subject matter and a concrete reporting deadline, but it provides limited procedural and resourcing detail necessary for th…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.