Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,…
The bill amends CERCLA Section 104(k) to increase brownfields grant and loan caps, expand eligible entities, allow limited demolition spending, add ranking priorities, require audits and reporting, fund technical assistance for small communities, and authorize appropriations for FY2027–2031. It reauthorizes State/tribal Section 128 grants with new inventory requirements, directs GAO and EPA studies on revolving loan funds, loan program feasibility, NPL deletion, and issues guidance to streamline Federal permitting for brownfield projects.
Support for increased funding: liberals/centrists yes, conservatives wary of federal cost
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive amendment to CERCLA that clearly specifies funding authorizations, modifies program limits and eligibility, and embeds multiple reporting and oversight requirements.
The bill amends CERCLA Section 104(k) to increase brownfields grant and loan caps, expand eligible entities, allow limited demolition spending, add ranking priorities, require audits and reporting, fund technical assistance for small communities, and authorize appropriations for FY2027–2031.
It reauthorizes State/tribal Section 128 grants with new inventory requirements, directs GAO and EPA studies on revolving loan funds, loan program feasibility, NPL deletion, and issues guidance to streamline Federal permitting for brownfield projects.
The bill also waives matching requirements for eligible entities located in small or disadvantaged communities and reserves a small oversight set‑aside from appropriations.
Content is technical and bipartisan-leaning with modest cost, improving chances; ultimate enactment depends on appropriations and legislative timing.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive amendment to CERCLA that clearly specifies funding authorizations, modifies program limits and eligibility, and embeds multiple reporting and oversight requirements. It is operationally detailed and integrates with existing statutory structures.
Support for increased funding: liberals/centrists yes, conservatives wary of federal cost
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Support for increased funding: liberals/centrists yes, conservatives wary of federal cost
Generally supportive of increased brownfields funding and technical assistance, especially for small and disadvantaged communities.
Concerned about expanding eligibility to 501(c)(6) organizations and allowing demolition spending without strong community protections.
Wants stronger environmental justice safeguards and community benefit conditions.
Views the bill as a pragmatic update to brownfields programs: modestly larger grants, clearer assistance for small communities, and accountability measures.
Appreciates audits, studies, and permitting guidance that can reduce delays.
Cautious about expanded eligibility and long‑term fiscal impacts; wants measured oversight and clear performance metrics.
Skeptical about increased federal spending and expanded program scope.
Supports streamlining permitting but wary of additional federal grants and waiving matches for communities.
May view 501(c)(6) eligibility positively if private developers can access funds, but overall prefers state and private solutions over federal expansion.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is technical and bipartisan-leaning with modest cost, improving chances; ultimate enactment depends on appropriations and legislative timing.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Support for increased funding: liberals/centrists yes, conservatives wary of federal cost
Content is technical and bipartisan-leaning with modest cost, improving chances; ultimate enactment depends on appropriations and legislati…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive amendment to CERCLA that clearly specifies funding authorizations, modifies program limits and eligibility, and embeds multiple reporting and oversig…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.