H.R. 875 (119th)Bill Overview

Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act of 2025

Immigration|Alcoholic beveragesDrug, alcohol, tobacco use
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 31, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make aliens who have committed or been convicted of driving while intoxicated or impaired inadmissible and those convicted deportable. Inadmissibility covers convictions, admissions, or admissions of acts constituting the offense as defined by the jurisdiction.

Why people may split

Whether single or misdemeanor DUIs warrant deportation

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that clearly identifies new grounds for inadmissibility and deportability and inserts them into specific statutory subsections.

This bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make aliens who have committed or been convicted of driving while intoxicated or impaired inadmissible and those convicted deportable.

Inadmissibility covers convictions, admissions, or admissions of acts constituting the offense as defined by the jurisdiction.

Deportability applies to aliens convicted of such offenses.

Passage35/100

Statute is narrowly written but politically sensitive; possible House support offset by significant Senate hurdles and legal challenges.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that clearly identifies new grounds for inadmissibility and deportability and inserts them into specific statutory subsections. The statutory placement and wording are direct and implementable within existing enforcement frameworks.

Contention65/100

Whether single or misdemeanor DUIs warrant deportation

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitSupporters argue it improves public safety by removing noncitizens convicted of driving while intoxicated.
  • Potential benefitCreates a clear immigration ground, enabling DHS and consular officers to deny entry or benefits for DWI offenses.
  • Local governmentsApplies regardless of misdemeanor or felony label, preventing evasion via local classification differences.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMakes many misdemeanor DWI convictions deportable, affecting lawful permanent residents and long-term noncitizens.
  • Federal agenciesLikely increases immigration detention use, court caseloads, and related federal enforcement costs.
  • Potential burdenMay deter victims, witnesses, or drivers from reporting crashes or seeking medical help due to immigration fears.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether single or misdemeanor DUIs warrant deportation
Progressive20%

Likely views the bill as an overly broad expansion of immigration enforcement that criminalizes conduct already handled by state criminal systems.

Concerned about family separation, disparate impacts, and lack of proportionality or rehabilitation focus.

May oppose unless narrowed to serious or repeated offenses and protections added for long-term residents.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Sees public safety rationale but is concerned about the bill’s broad language and practical consequences.

Supports aligning immigration policy with serious criminal conduct but wants safeguards against disproportionate removals and administrative burden.

Would seek amendments narrowing scope to serious, repeated, or recent convictions and adding discretionary relief.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely favors the bill as strengthening immigration enforcement and protecting communities from impaired drivers.

Views removal and inadmissibility for DUI/DWI convictions as appropriate public-safety measures.

Few ideological objections, though some may note implementation details or state-federal definition variances.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Statute is narrowly written but politically sensitive; possible House support offset by significant Senate hurdles and legal challenges.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or appropriation for enforcement
  • How broadly 'admits' will be interpreted administratively
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

HOUSE · Jun 26, 2025
Final passage✓ PassedParty-line

The House passed this bill. It now goes to the other chamber, and eventually to the President for signature.

What is a final passage?

The final vote on whether the bill becomes law (pending the other chamber and the President).

Yes 61% No 40%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether single or misdemeanor DUIs warrant deportation

Statute is narrowly written but politically sensitive; possible House support offset by significant Senate hurdles and legal challenges.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that clearly identifies new grounds for inadmissibility and deportability and insert…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis