Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
The bill amends section 1(b) of the Defense Base Act to expressly exclude Guam from the Act's definition of a "territory or possession outside the continental United States," i.e., it removes Guam from the geographic scope of the Defense Base Act.
Progressives focus on loss of worker protections and benefit reductions.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective but provides unclear and internally inconsistent amendment text and omits practical scaffolding (effective date, transitional rules, fiscal notice, and edge-case handling).
The bill amends section 1(b) of the Defense Base Act to expressly exclude Guam from the Act's definition of a "territory or possession outside the continental United States," i.e., it removes Guam from the geographic scope of the Defense Base Act.
Narrow and simple but raises worker-protection and liability concerns; lacks compromise features and may face organized opposition.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective but provides unclear and internally inconsistent amendment text and omits practical scaffolding (effective date, transitional rules, fiscal notice, and edge-case handling).
Progressives focus on loss of worker protections and benefit reductions.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives focus on loss of worker protections and benefit reductions.
Likely views the bill as a reduction in federal worker protections for people working in Guam.
Concern will focus on potential loss of guaranteed Defense Base Act benefits and unclear replacement protections.
Would evaluate tradeoffs: potential cost savings and local control versus loss of uniform federal protections.
Support would depend on assurances that Guam law or other mechanisms maintain comparable benefits.
Will likely welcome excluding Guam as reducing federal overreach and regulatory burden on contractors.
Emphasis on local governance and lowering costs will guide support.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and simple but raises worker-protection and liability concerns; lacks compromise features and may face organized opposition.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives focus on loss of worker protections and benefit reductions.
Narrow and simple but raises worker-protection and liability concerns; lacks compromise features and may face organized opposition.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective but provides unclear and internally inconsistent amendment text and omits pract…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.