H.R. 878 (119th)Bill Overview

Katrina and Leslie Schaller Act

Social Welfare|Disability assistanceGuam
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 31, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill adds Guam to statutory definitions under the Social Security Act so Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is available to Guam residents. It amends multiple sections to include Guam, removes certain payment limits affecting Guam, grants the Social Security Commissioner limited waiver authority to adapt SSI rules for Guam, and sets an effective date of the first day of the first federal fiscal year beginning at least one year after enactment.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes equity and poverty reduction for Guam residents

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory change that clearly amends the Social Security Act to extend SSI to Guam and grants administrative flexibility to the Commissioner.

This bill adds Guam to statutory definitions under the Social Security Act so Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is available to Guam residents.

It amends multiple sections to include Guam, removes certain payment limits affecting Guam, grants the Social Security Commissioner limited waiver authority to adapt SSI rules for Guam, and sets an effective date of the first day of the first federal fiscal year beginning at least one year after enactment.

Passage40/100

Technically simple and sympathetic territory extension but adds mandatory costs; fiscal scrutiny and floor procedures lower passage odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory change that clearly amends the Social Security Act to extend SSI to Guam and grants administrative flexibility to the Commissioner. It is precise in the legal amendments and effective date but sparse on fiscal, procedural, and oversight details.

Contention68/100

Left emphasizes equity and poverty reduction for Guam residents

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitDirect monthly cash benefits for low-income elderly, blind, and disabled Guam residents would begin.
  • Potential benefitLikely reduction in poverty and improved basic income security among eligible Guam residents.
  • Local governmentsIncreased local consumer spending could modestly support Guam's economy and small businesses.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesExtending SSI to Guam will increase federal SSI outlays and add budgetary costs.
  • Local governmentsImplementation requires SSA administrative resources, raising federal and local regulatory burdens and costs.
  • Potential burdenSSI payment levels may not fully cover Guam's higher cost of living, limiting purchasing power.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes equity and poverty reduction for Guam residents
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive.

Expanding SSI to Guam advances benefit parity for a U.S. territory and helps low-income elderly and disabled residents.

The waiver authority is seen as pragmatic if not used to weaken protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but cautious.

Supports fairness for Guam residents, while wanting clear cost estimates, implementation plans, and guardrails on waivers.

Would seek oversight and fiscal transparency before full support.

Leans supportive
Conservative20%

Likely opposed or skeptical.

Views the bill as an expansion of a federal entitlement to a territory, raising concerns about fiscal cost, precedent for other territories, and federal overreach.

May accept limited flexibility but prefer offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Technically simple and sympathetic territory extension but adds mandatory costs; fiscal scrutiny and floor procedures lower passage odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included in text
  • Number of SSI-eligible individuals in Guam
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes equity and poverty reduction for Guam residents

Technically simple and sympathetic territory extension but adds mandatory costs; fiscal scrutiny and floor procedures lower passage odds.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory change that clearly amends the Social Security Act to extend SSI to Guam and grants administrative flexibility to the Commissioner. It is preci…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis