- Federal agenciesIncreases federal subsidy to lower issuers' net borrowing costs for eligible infrastructure projects.
- Targeted stakeholdersEncourages financing of capital and operations projects that might otherwise lack funding sources.
- Targeted stakeholdersApplies Davis‑Bacon rules, promoting prevailing wages on funded construction projects.
LIFT Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Creates a new refundable credit to issuers of qualifying "American infrastructure bonds" that pays a percentage of each interest payment.
Defines eligible bonds, makes interest on such bonds taxable, applies Davis‑Bacon labor rules, revises advance‑refunding rules, and permanently raises and indexes the small‑issuer safe harbor for financial institutions from $10M to $30M.
Effective dates generally apply to obligations issued more than 30 days after enactment.
Substantive but narrow tax subsidy with both attractive infrastructure aims and significant fiscal exposure; success hinges on cost offsets and coalition building.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a well-specified statutory framework for a new issuer credit for "American infrastructure bonds," with detailed definitions, payment mechanics, refunding rules, and careful integration into existing tax provisions, while also including procedural conforming amendments.
Labor rules: liberals welcome Davis‑Bacon; conservatives view it as costly.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesIncreases federal outlays by funding refundable credits to bond issuers, adding budgetary cost.
- Targeted stakeholdersRequires interest be includible in holders' gross income, potentially reducing investor demand or raising yields.
- Targeted stakeholdersCreates additional administrative and compliance burdens for issuers and the IRS to implement new rules.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Labor rules: liberals welcome Davis‑Bacon; conservatives view it as costly.
Likely broadly supportive.
The direct credit to issuers can lower municipal borrowing costs and expand public infrastructure financing.
Davis‑Bacon coverage and exclusion of private‑activity bonds align with labor and public‑ownership priorities.
Cautiously favorable.
Provides a pragmatic federal tool to make local infrastructure cheaper and clarifies refunding rules.
Concerns focus on fiscal cost, complexity, and anti‑abuse enforcement.
Skeptical.
Views the refundable credit as a federal subsidy for municipal borrowing that increases taxpayer costs and federal involvement.
Opposed to Davis‑Bacon mandates raising project costs.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive but narrow tax subsidy with both attractive infrastructure aims and significant fiscal exposure; success hinges on cost offsets and coalition building.
- No official cost estimate or PAYGO offsets included
- Level of municipal and financial-industry support unknown
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Labor rules: liberals welcome Davis‑Bacon; conservatives view it as costly.
Substantive but narrow tax subsidy with both attractive infrastructure aims and significant fiscal exposure; success hinges on cost offsets…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a well-specified statutory framework for a new issuer credit for "American infrastructure bonds," with detailed definitions, payment mechanics, refunding…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.