Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill directs the Federal Communications Commission to issue regulations, within 90 days, requiring cable and direct broadcast satellite providers to give subscribers rebates whenever the provider denies access to video programming because of a covered negotiation (retransmission consent or carriage). The FCC must also set the appropriate rebate amount.
Liberal emphasizes consumer protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive regulatory change by imposing a statutory directive for rebates and delegates regulatory particulars to the FCC with a short timeline, but it leaves critical operational, fiscal, and enforcement details to future rulemaking or unspecified.
The bill directs the Federal Communications Commission to issue regulations, within 90 days, requiring cable and direct broadcast satellite providers to give subscribers rebates whenever the provider denies access to video programming because of a covered negotiation (retransmission consent or carriage).
The FCC must also set the appropriate rebate amount.
Definitions for covered negotiation, provider, television broadcast station, and video programming are provided.
Legislatively modest but industry opposition and Senate hurdles reduce chances; easier as part of a larger compromise package.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive regulatory change by imposing a statutory directive for rebates and delegates regulatory particulars to the FCC with a short timeline, but it leaves critical operational, fiscal, and enforcement details to future rulemaking or unspecified.
Liberal emphasizes consumer protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes consumer protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach
Likely supportive as a consumer-protection measure that holds providers accountable when contracted programming is withheld.
Sees the bill as curbing corporate leverage in retransmission and carriage disputes, but wants strong, meaningful rebate rules and broad coverage.
Generally positive about protecting consumers from service interruptions, but cautious about regulatory design.
Wants the FCC rulemaking to balance fairness, legal defensibility, and minimal market distortion, with clear cost-allocation guidance.
Skeptical of expanding FCC authority and federal micromanagement of private carriage negotiations.
Worries the mandate creates regulatory burdens, interferes with free bargaining, and could raise costs for consumers and providers.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Legislatively modest but industry opposition and Senate hurdles reduce chances; easier as part of a larger compromise package.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes consumer protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach
Legislatively modest but industry opposition and Senate hurdles reduce chances; easier as part of a larger compromise package.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive regulatory change by imposing a statutory directive for rebates and delegates regulatory particulars to the FCC with a short timeline,…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.