H.R. 8973 (119th)Bill Overview

Sergeant Rafael Peralta Medal of Honor Authorization Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
May 21, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill authorizes the President to award the Medal of Honor to Sergeant Rafael Peralta for actions in Fallujah, Iraq on November 15, 2004, and waives statutory time limits that would otherwise bar the award. It includes congressional findings recounting eyewitness reports of Peralta pulling a grenade beneath his body while mortally wounded, and a sense of Congress that his actions merit full consideration for the Medal of Honor.

Why people may split

Degree of concern about setting precedent by waiving time limits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory waiver and authorization that is clearly drafted and integrates directly with existing title 10 authorities, providing proportionate legal authority for a one-off administrative award.

The bill authorizes the President to award the Medal of Honor to Sergeant Rafael Peralta for actions in Fallujah, Iraq on November 15, 2004, and waives statutory time limits that would otherwise bar the award.

It includes congressional findings recounting eyewitness reports of Peralta pulling a grenade beneath his body while mortally wounded, and a sense of Congress that his actions merit full consideration for the Medal of Honor.

Passage75/100

Narrow, symbolic waiver with minimal fiscal impact and precedent for similar measures; possible procedural or Department of Defense concerns remain.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory waiver and authorization that is clearly drafted and integrates directly with existing title 10 authorities, providing proportionate legal authority for a one-off administrative award.

Contention15/100

Degree of concern about setting precedent by waiving time limits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
FamiliesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFormally recognizes and honors a service member for alleged extraordinary battlefield valor.
  • FamiliesProvides closure and official recognition to Peralta's family and surviving unit members.
  • Potential benefitSupports military morale by demonstrating Congress will address perceived administrative delays in awards.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay set a precedent for Congress to override medal time limits in other disputed cases.
  • Potential burdenCould prompt renewed scrutiny or controversy over factual findings and investigative records.
  • Potential burdenMight be viewed as congressional intervention into military awards processes and adjudication.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Degree of concern about setting precedent by waiving time limits
Progressive95%

Likely supportive: views the bill as correcting an administrative barrier and recognizing an act of self-sacrifice documented by eyewitnesses.

Sees honoring a fallen Marine and ensuring fairness in awards as consistent with values of dignity and equal treatment for service members.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but cautious: favors honoring a potentially meritorious act while wanting the award process to observe evidentiary standards and avoid undermining statutory procedures.

Sees the bill as narrow and limited in scope.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Supportive in principle: values recognizing battlefield heroism and supporting veterans; comfortable waiving technical time limits to honor a clearly heroic act.

Also favors ensuring rigor so awards aren't politically driven.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood75/100

Narrow, symbolic waiver with minimal fiscal impact and precedent for similar measures; possible procedural or Department of Defense concerns remain.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Department of Defense position or review history
  • President's willingness to make the award
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Degree of concern about setting precedent by waiving time limits

Narrow, symbolic waiver with minimal fiscal impact and precedent for similar measures; possible procedural or Department of Defense concern…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory waiver and authorization that is clearly drafted and integrates directly with existing title 10 authorities, providing proportionate l…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis