Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to require steps protecting the 9-8-8 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline from cybersecurity incidents and eliminating known vulnerabilities. It mandates reporting chains: local/regional crisis centers report vulnerabilities/incidents to the federally funded program network administrator, who must report to the Assistant Secretary.
Support level: liberals strongly back protections; conservatives worry about federal overreach.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive legal obligations—chiefly reporting duties and an obligation to protect the 9-8-8 lifeline—and adds a mandated Comptroller General study, but it leaves key implementation elements underspecified.
This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to require steps protecting the 9-8-8 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline from cybersecurity incidents and eliminating known vulnerabilities.
It mandates reporting chains: local/regional crisis centers report vulnerabilities/incidents to the federally funded program network administrator, who must report to the Assistant Secretary.
The bill clarifies oversight roles between crisis centers and network administrators, states reporting supplements existing federal law, and requires the Comptroller General to complete a GAO study on 9-8-8 cybersecurity risks within 180 days.
Short, technical, low-cost statutory fixes tied to public safety typically clear committees and receive bipartisan support; modest procedural friction remains.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive legal obligations—chiefly reporting duties and an obligation to protect the 9-8-8 lifeline—and adds a mandated Comptroller General study, but it leaves key implementation elements underspecified.
Support level: liberals strongly back protections; conservatives worry about federal overreach.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Support level: liberals strongly back protections; conservatives worry about federal overreach.
Likely broadly supportive: protecting a suicide-prevention service aligns with public health and equity priorities.
They will welcome mandatory vulnerability reporting and a GAO study, while seeking strong privacy protections and resources for implementation.
Generally favorable but pragmatic: the bill addresses a clear operational risk to an important service.
They will want clarity on implementation details, timelines, and cost implications before full endorsement.
Cautiously skeptical: protecting a suicide hotline is agreeable, but increased federal reporting and oversight raise concerns about overreach and unfunded mandates.
Privacy language helps, yet costs and federal involvement worry this persona.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Short, technical, low-cost statutory fixes tied to public safety typically clear committees and receive bipartisan support; modest procedural friction remains.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Support level: liberals strongly back protections; conservatives worry about federal overreach.
Short, technical, low-cost statutory fixes tied to public safety typically clear committees and receive bipartisan support; modest procedur…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive legal obligations—chiefly reporting duties and an obligation to protect the 9-8-8 lifeline—and adds a mandated Comptroller General study, but…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.