Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to require that any agricultural product packaged in a can and subject to country-of-origin marking display that marking on the front label or be stamped/embossed/printed on the top of the can. The rule applies only to imported agricultural products and takes effect for imports arriving 18 months after enactment.
Transparency and support for domestic producers versus regulatory burden on firms
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that is sufficiently specific to change legal labeling requirements for canned agricultural products while relying on existing statutory enforcement frameworks for implementation.
This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to require that any agricultural product packaged in a can and subject to country-of-origin marking display that marking on the front label or be stamped/embossed/printed on the top of the can.
The rule applies only to imported agricultural products and takes effect for imports arriving 18 months after enactment.
The change only specifies placement of existing country-of-origin markings; it does not change which products must be marked or the content of the marking.
Content is narrow and administratively straightforward, favoring passage, but absent cost analysis and possible industry/trade objections reduce near-term prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that is sufficiently specific to change legal labeling requirements for canned agricultural products while relying on existing statutory enforcement frameworks for implementation.
Transparency and support for domestic producers versus regulatory burden on firms
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Transparency and support for domestic producers versus regulatory burden on firms
Likely supportive because it increases consumer transparency and helps shoppers identify origin of food.
They will see it as a modest, targeted consumer-rights measure that can benefit local producers and food-safety traceability.
Generally supportive but pragmatic; appreciates transparency and the 18-month phase-in, while wanting cost estimates and flexibility for small businesses.
Will look for minimal regulatory complexity and clear enforcement guidance.
Skeptical of added federal labeling mandates; sees this as regulatory overreach that imposes costs on businesses.
May accept narrow rules if proven cost-minimal, but generally prefers market-based disclosure over new mandates.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administratively straightforward, favoring passage, but absent cost analysis and possible industry/trade objections reduce near-term prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Transparency and support for domestic producers versus regulatory burden on firms
Content is narrow and administratively straightforward, favoring passage, but absent cost analysis and possible industry/trade objections r…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that is sufficiently specific to change legal labeling requirements for canned agricultural products while relying on existin…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.