H.R. 916 (119th)Bill Overview

Rosa Parks Commemorative Coin Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Finance and Financial Sector
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Treasury to mint commemorative coins honoring Rosa Parks during calendar year 2029: up to 50,000 $5 gold coins, 400,000 $1 silver coins, and 750,000 half-dollar clad coins. Designs must reflect Parks’ legacy, include at least one obverse with her likeness, and be selected after consultation with the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute and the Commission of Fine Arts.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize fundraising for civil rights education; conservatives stress limited government precedent.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is well-constructed: it clearly states purpose, provides detailed coin specifications and financial mechanisms, integrates with relevant statutory authorities, and includes basic accountability and limitation provisions.

This bill directs the Secretary of the Treasury to mint commemorative coins honoring Rosa Parks during calendar year 2029: up to 50,000 $5 gold coins, 400,000 $1 silver coins, and 750,000 half-dollar clad coins.

Designs must reflect Parks’ legacy, include at least one obverse with her likeness, and be selected after consultation with the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute and the Commission of Fine Arts.

Sales include specified surcharges ($35 gold, $10 silver, $5 half-dollar) payable to the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute, subject to audit and Treasury cost-recovery rules, and coins must not impose a net cost on the federal government.

Passage90/100

Highly targeted, low-cost, non-ideological commemorative measure with standard safeguards and broad support signals.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is well-constructed: it clearly states purpose, provides detailed coin specifications and financial mechanisms, integrates with relevant statutory authorities, and includes basic accountability and limitation provisions.

Contention20/100

Liberals emphasize fundraising for civil rights education; conservatives stress limited government precedent.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises funds for the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute through statutory coin surcharges.
  • Potential benefitPromotes public awareness and education about Rosa Parks and civil rights history.
  • Potential benefitGenerates numismatic sales revenue and supports Mint operations and collectors.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRisk that inadequate sales could delay disbursements until Treasury recovers full production costs.
  • Potential burdenPotential perception of commercialization or commodification of a civil rights legacy.
  • Potential burdenAdministrative and production costs could strain Mint resources or displace other commemorative programs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize fundraising for civil rights education; conservatives stress limited government precedent.
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive: sees the bill as an appropriate federal recognition of a civil rights icon and a revenue source for youth and civil rights education.

Would welcome consultation requirements and audit language but watch for commercialization of Parks’ legacy and equitable public access to the coins.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but pragmatic: views the coin as symbolic and low-cost if Treasury enforces cost recovery.

Wants clear financial and administrative procedures to prevent hidden taxpayer exposure and ensure the intended nonprofit uses the funds effectively.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously supportive to mixed: may accept honoring Rosa Parks as noncontroversial symbolism, but concerned about government resources used to produce coins and directing surcharges to a specific non-government organization.

Emphasizes minimizing federal involvement and ensuring no taxpayer subsidy.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Highly targeted, low-cost, non-ideological commemorative measure with standard safeguards and broad support signals.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Annual limit on commemorative programs could delay or block issuance
  • No CBO cost estimate included in bill text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize fundraising for civil rights education; conservatives stress limited government precedent.

Highly targeted, low-cost, non-ideological commemorative measure with standard safeguards and broad support signals.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is well-constructed: it clearly states purpose, provides detailed coin specifications and financial mechanisms, integrates with relevant statutory authorities, and in…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis