H.R. 930 (119th)Bill Overview

Stop the Wait Act of 2025

Social Welfare|Disability assistanceHealth care coverage and access
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill eliminates the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) five-month waiting period so disability benefits begin immediately, phases down the waiting period for applications filed 2025–2029, and makes related conforming changes. It also waives the 24-month Medicare Part A waiting requirement for certain people under 65 entitled to SSDI, provides special enrollment and retroactive coverage rules for those individuals, and updates related statutory cross-references.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes immediate relief and Medicare access; right emphasizes fiscal cost and work incentives.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and technically specific statutory reform that directly amends existing Social Security and related provisions to eliminate the SSDI waiting period and to adjust Medicare enrollment rules, with a multi-year phase-down and concrete effective dates.

The bill eliminates the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) five-month waiting period so disability benefits begin immediately, phases down the waiting period for applications filed 2025–2029, and makes related conforming changes.

It also waives the 24-month Medicare Part A waiting requirement for certain people under 65 entitled to SSDI, provides special enrollment and retroactive coverage rules for those individuals, and updates related statutory cross-references.

Effective dates: phase-down applies to applications filed 2025–2029; full elimination becomes effective January 1, 2030 (applicants on/after January 1, 2029).

Passage35/100

Technically focused and sympathetic to beneficiaries, but material fiscal costs and Senate procedural barriers reduce near‑term chances absent offsets or bipartisan deal.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and technically specific statutory reform that directly amends existing Social Security and related provisions to eliminate the SSDI waiting period and to adjust Medicare enrollment rules, with a multi-year phase-down and concrete effective dates.

Contention72/100

Left emphasizes immediate relief and Medicare access; right emphasizes fiscal cost and work incentives.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • WorkersProvides earlier income support to disabled workers, reducing immediate financial hardship.
  • Potential benefitGrants earlier Medicare Part A access for many newly entitled SSDI beneficiaries, improving health coverage timing.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce reliance on emergency care and uncompensated hospital costs by expanding timely coverage.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal outlays for SSDI and Medicare by paying benefits and coverage earlier.
  • Potential burdenMay accelerate depletion pressure on the SSDI and Medicare trust funds, potentially raising fiscal concerns.
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative tasks and systems changes for SSA and CMS to implement phased reductions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes immediate relief and Medicare access; right emphasizes fiscal cost and work incentives.
Progressive95%

Generally strongly supportive: immediate benefits reduce financial hardship and improve access to health care for newly disabled people.

Sees the Medicare provisions as critical to prevent coverage gaps and to protect low-income disabled people.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautious support if fiscal and administrative consequences are addressed.

Praises reduced hardship but wants cost estimates and implementation plans to protect program solvency.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed overall: views elimination as an expansion of entitlement spending that risks solvency and work disincentives.

Concerned about federal cost and program integrity.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Technically focused and sympathetic to beneficiaries, but material fiscal costs and Senate procedural barriers reduce near‑term chances absent offsets or bipartisan deal.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absent CBO score and cost estimate
  • Committee appetite and markup timing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes immediate relief and Medicare access; right emphasizes fiscal cost and work incentives.

Technically focused and sympathetic to beneficiaries, but material fiscal costs and Senate procedural barriers reduce near‑term chances abs…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and technically specific statutory reform that directly amends existing Social Security and related provisions to eliminate the SSDI waiting period and to…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis