Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
This bill amends 49 U.S.C. to extend and modify the One-Stop Pilot Program that permits screened passengers and their checked baggage, arriving from participating foreign last-point-of-departure airports, to continue on additional U.S.-originating flights without additional TSA re-screening. It codifies conditions: initial baggage screening with approved explosive detection under an aviation security agreement, passengers’ inability to access baggage until final destination, timely transmission of baggage images to CBP, and no CBP selection for further inspection.
Progressives emphasize transparency, audits, and civil liberties.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a focused statutory amendment that extends and clarifies authority for a one‑stop checked baggage pilot program and sets several specific conditions under which baggage may continue without re‑screening, but it provides minimal implementation, fiscal, and accountability detail.
This bill amends 49 U.S.C. to extend and modify the One-Stop Pilot Program that permits screened passengers and their checked baggage, arriving from participating foreign last-point-of-departure airports, to continue on additional U.S.-originating flights without additional TSA re-screening.
It codifies conditions: initial baggage screening with approved explosive detection under an aviation security agreement, passengers’ inability to access baggage until final destination, timely transmission of baggage images to CBP, and no CBP selection for further inspection.
It also changes the pilot program term from six years to ten years.
Small, administratively focused extension of an existing pilot; historically such technical security fixes often clear Congress if not tied to larger disputes.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a focused statutory amendment that extends and clarifies authority for a one‑stop checked baggage pilot program and sets several specific conditions under which baggage may continue without re‑screening, but it provides minimal implementation, fiscal, and accountability detail.
Progressives emphasize transparency, audits, and civil liberties.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize transparency, audits, and civil liberties.
Generally cautiously supportive of efficiency and traveler convenience, but concerned about border security, civil liberties, and adequate oversight.
Wants stronger transparency, independent audits, and clear reporting requirements before full adoption.
Pragmatically favorable if the extension demonstrably improves efficiency without reducing security.
Wants measurable performance metrics, cost-benefit analysis, and periodic reviews to validate safety and savings.
Generally supportive of reducing regulatory redundancy and improving travel efficiency, provided border security and law-enforcement authority remain intact.
Prefers streamlined federal procedures and faster implementation.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, administratively focused extension of an existing pilot; historically such technical security fixes often clear Congress if not tied to larger disputes.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize transparency, audits, and civil liberties.
Small, administratively focused extension of an existing pilot; historically such technical security fixes often clear Congress if not tied…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a focused statutory amendment that extends and clarifies authority for a one‑stop checked baggage pilot program and sets several specific conditions unde…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.