H.R. 9392 (119th)Bill Overview

Medicare Advantage Cost Transparency Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 23, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends Medicare Advantage encounter-data rules to require, for plan years starting January 1, 2027, inclusion of: the allowed payment amount, patient cost-sharing amounts (deductible, copayment, coinsurance), and indicators showing whether the beneficiary previously received an at‑home health risk assessment. The indicators must distinguish assessments provided by an assessment entity that is owned or controlled by the MA organization (a "specified assessment entity") from assessments provided by other assessment entities.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes transparency and anti‑conflict oversight benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly targeted statutory requirement to add specific data elements to Medicare Advantage encounter data and provides basic definitions and an effective date, but it leaves significant operational, technical, fiscal, and accountability details to be specified by the Secretary without statutory guidance.

This bill amends Medicare Advantage encounter-data rules to require, for plan years starting January 1, 2027, inclusion of: the allowed payment amount, patient cost-sharing amounts (deductible, copayment, coinsurance), and indicators showing whether the beneficiary previously received an at‑home health risk assessment.

The indicators must distinguish assessments provided by an assessment entity that is owned or controlled by the MA organization (a "specified assessment entity") from assessments provided by other assessment entities.

The Secretary of HHS will define "assessment entity."

Passage40/100

Narrow, low-cost transparency measure with plausible bipartisan support, yet potential industry resistance and procedural barriers lower odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly targeted statutory requirement to add specific data elements to Medicare Advantage encounter data and provides basic definitions and an effective date, but it leaves significant operational, technical, fiscal, and accountability details to be specified by the Secretary without statutory guidance.

Contention55/100

Left emphasizes transparency and anti‑conflict oversight benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases price transparency by reporting allowed amounts for items and services in Medicare Advantage encounters.
  • Potential benefitMakes patient cost-sharing visible by requiring deductible, copayment, and coinsurance amounts per encounter.
  • Potential benefitEnables oversight and detection of potential financial conflicts by flagging assessments tied to plan ownership interes…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative and IT implementation costs for Medicare Advantage plans and providers.
  • Potential burdenMay raise patient privacy risks by transmitting additional encounter-level cost and assessment indicators.
  • Potential burdenCould discourage plan partnerships with third-party assessors due to reporting and ownership flag requirements.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes transparency and anti‑conflict oversight benefits
Progressive85%

Likely views the bill favorably as a transparency and anti-conflict measure that can expose related‑party arrangements and beneficiary cost burdens.

Sees potential to support oversight, beneficiary protection, and data for evaluating in‑home assessment programs.

Some uncertainty about implementation resources and data privacy, but overall supportive.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally supportive of transparency but cautious about implementation costs and unintended consequences.

Wants clearer definitions, a reasonable phase‑in, and funding for IT changes.

Views the bill as a pragmatic oversight improvement if administrative burdens are constrained.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical of additional federal reporting mandates and potential regulatory expansion into MA plan operations.

Concerned this creates unnecessary compliance costs that could be passed to beneficiaries or reduce plan flexibility.

May accept limited transparency but not at high cost.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow, low-cost transparency measure with plausible bipartisan support, yet potential industry resistance and procedural barriers lower odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or cost estimate provided
  • CMS technical capacity and timeline for data collection
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes transparency and anti‑conflict oversight benefits

Narrow, low-cost transparency measure with plausible bipartisan support, yet potential industry resistance and procedural barriers lower od…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly targeted statutory requirement to add specific data elements to Medicare Advantage encounter data and provides basic definitions and an…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis