Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for…
The bill imposes an immediate moratorium on construction or upgrading of defined "artificial intelligence data centers" until Congress enacts laws requiring federal premarket review of AI products, worker-benefit rules, environmental and community protections, and other conditions. It defines AI data centers by scale and design (including >20 MW, ≥20 kW per rack, or liquid cooling), requires extensive quarterly DOE reporting and verification powers, and directs Commerce to block exports or transfers of computing infrastructure hardware for AI end-uses to countries lacking comparable laws.
Progressives emphasize safety, labor, climate protections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive regulatory prohibition (a moratorium) coupled with reporting requirements and export controls, and it contains a mix of concrete definitions and higher-level policy conditions required for lifting the ban.
The bill imposes an immediate moratorium on construction or upgrading of defined "artificial intelligence data centers" until Congress enacts laws requiring federal premarket review of AI products, worker-benefit rules, environmental and community protections, and other conditions.
It defines AI data centers by scale and design (including >20 MW, ≥20 kW per rack, or liquid cooling), requires extensive quarterly DOE reporting and verification powers, and directs Commerce to block exports or transfers of computing infrastructure hardware for AI end-uses to countries lacking comparable laws.
Ambitious, intrusive, and ideologically charged package with major industry and international implications makes enactment unlikely absent major revision.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive regulatory prohibition (a moratorium) coupled with reporting requirements and export controls, and it contains a mix of concrete definitions and higher-level policy conditions required for lifting the ban.
Progressives emphasize safety, labor, climate protections.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize safety, labor, climate protections.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill pauses high-impact AI infrastructure until public-safety, labor, climate, and equity safeguards are enacted.
Sees the moratorium and reporting as tools to force democratic oversight of AI and protect workers and communities.
Mixed.
Supports stronger AI oversight, environmental safeguards, and labor protections, but worries the moratorium and export controls are blunt instruments with economic and diplomatic costs.
Likely strongly opposed.
Views the bill as heavy-handed federal intervention that halts private investment, expands regulation, and restricts exports and free enterprise.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Ambitious, intrusive, and ideologically charged package with major industry and international implications makes enactment unlikely absent major revision.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize safety, labor, climate protections.
Ambitious, intrusive, and ideologically charged package with major industry and international implications makes enactment unlikely absent…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive regulatory prohibition (a moratorium) coupled with reporting requirements and export controls, and it contains a mix of concrete definitions…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.