- Federal agenciesClarifies and resolves federal reversionary interests, providing private title certainty for parcel owners.
- Federal agenciesGenerates federal receipts deposited into the Federal Land Disposal Account for future land transactions.
- Local governmentsEnables local development or investment on conveyed parcels, potentially increasing property tax revenue and jobs.
Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior (BLM) to offer and convey the United States’ reversionary interests in approximately 8.43 acres in Sacramento, California, to the recorded parcel owners upon request. Conveyances must occur within two years of a buyer’s request, be sold for not less than fair market value based on required federal appraisal standards, and the buyer pays all related costs.
Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-integrated conveyance statute that specifies who may purchase, the valuation standards to be used, cost allocation, and disposition of proceeds.
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior (BLM) to offer and convey the United States’ reversionary interests in approximately 8.43 acres in Sacramento, California, to the recorded parcel owners upon request.
Conveyances must occur within two years of a buyer’s request, be sold for not less than fair market value based on required federal appraisal standards, and the buyer pays all related costs.
Sale proceeds go to the Federal Land Disposal Account under the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act; conveyances remain subject to valid existing rights and preserve a minimum railroad right-of-way width.
Localized, technical, low-cost conveyance with standard safeguards; historically such bills often succeed, though committee/administrative objections could slow progress.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-integrated conveyance statute that specifies who may purchase, the valuation standards to be used, cost allocation, and disposition of proceeds. It integrates with relevant existing statutes and protects certain preexisting rights.
Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesTransfers federal public land to private owners, reducing federal holdings and oversight.
- Potential burdenCould limit public access or environmental protections on the conveyed acres if future development occurs.
- Potential burdenMay confer private benefit from historical reversionary claims, raising equity concerns among neighboring stakeholders.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses
Views the bill as a narrow land-disposition measure that could resolve title issues but raises concerns about privatizing public land and foreclosing future public uses.
Appreciates procedural safeguards like federal appraisal standards and buyer-paid costs, but worries about precedent and environmental or access protections.
Sees the bill as a narrowly targeted, administrative fix to resolve reversionary interests and tidy federal land holdings.
Views statutory appraisal and buyer-payment requirements as prudent safeguards, but wants transparency, clear mapping, and assurance of no unintended access or environmental impacts.
Favors transferring federal reversionary interests to private owners to reduce federal land holdings and return land to local control.
Approves buyer-paid costs, mandatory fair-market appraisals, and revenue return.
Sees the measure as small-scale, pro-property-rights, and administratively straightforward.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Localized, technical, low-cost conveyance with standard safeguards; historically such bills often succeed, though committee/administrative objections could slow progress.
- Absent a formal cost estimate or Congressional Budget Office score
- Potential local environmental or cultural-resource objections
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses
Localized, technical, low-cost conveyance with standard safeguards; historically such bills often succeed, though committee/administrative…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-integrated conveyance statute that specifies who may purchase, the valuation standards to be used, cost allocation, and disposition of proc…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.