H.R. 952 (119th)Bill Overview

Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|CaliforniaLand transfers
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior (BLM) to offer and convey the United States’ reversionary interests in approximately 8.43 acres in Sacramento, California, to the recorded parcel owners upon request. Conveyances must occur within two years of a buyer’s request, be sold for not less than fair market value based on required federal appraisal standards, and the buyer pays all related costs.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-integrated conveyance statute that specifies who may purchase, the valuation standards to be used, cost allocation, and disposition of proceeds.

The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior (BLM) to offer and convey the United States’ reversionary interests in approximately 8.43 acres in Sacramento, California, to the recorded parcel owners upon request.

Conveyances must occur within two years of a buyer’s request, be sold for not less than fair market value based on required federal appraisal standards, and the buyer pays all related costs.

Sale proceeds go to the Federal Land Disposal Account under the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act; conveyances remain subject to valid existing rights and preserve a minimum railroad right-of-way width.

Passage55/100

Localized, technical, low-cost conveyance with standard safeguards; historically such bills often succeed, though committee/administrative objections could slow progress.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-integrated conveyance statute that specifies who may purchase, the valuation standards to be used, cost allocation, and disposition of proceeds. It integrates with relevant existing statutes and protects certain preexisting rights.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesClarifies and resolves federal reversionary interests, providing private title certainty for parcel owners.
  • Federal agenciesGenerates federal receipts deposited into the Federal Land Disposal Account for future land transactions.
  • Local governmentsEnables local development or investment on conveyed parcels, potentially increasing property tax revenue and jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesTransfers federal public land to private owners, reducing federal holdings and oversight.
  • Potential burdenCould limit public access or environmental protections on the conveyed acres if future development occurs.
  • Potential burdenMay confer private benefit from historical reversionary claims, raising equity concerns among neighboring stakeholders.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses
Progressive40%

Views the bill as a narrow land-disposition measure that could resolve title issues but raises concerns about privatizing public land and foreclosing future public uses.

Appreciates procedural safeguards like federal appraisal standards and buyer-paid costs, but worries about precedent and environmental or access protections.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

Sees the bill as a narrowly targeted, administrative fix to resolve reversionary interests and tidy federal land holdings.

Views statutory appraisal and buyer-payment requirements as prudent safeguards, but wants transparency, clear mapping, and assurance of no unintended access or environmental impacts.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Favors transferring federal reversionary interests to private owners to reduce federal land holdings and return land to local control.

Approves buyer-paid costs, mandatory fair-market appraisals, and revenue return.

Sees the measure as small-scale, pro-property-rights, and administratively straightforward.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Localized, technical, low-cost conveyance with standard safeguards; historically such bills often succeed, though committee/administrative objections could slow progress.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent a formal cost estimate or Congressional Budget Office score
  • Potential local environmental or cultural-resource objections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize privatization and loss of public uses

Localized, technical, low-cost conveyance with standard safeguards; historically such bills often succeed, though committee/administrative…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-integrated conveyance statute that specifies who may purchase, the valuation standards to be used, cost allocation, and disposition of proc…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis