Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill amends Section 747(c)(1) of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize grants and contracts for primary care training. It replaces the prior authorization level of $48,924,000 for FY2021–FY2025 with $49,924,000 for each fiscal year 2025–2030, extending the program and increasing the annual authorized funding by $1,000,000.
Liberals prioritize workforce expansion and equity targeting
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that precisely adjusts authorized funding amounts and extends the fiscal-year authorization window for existing primary care training and enhancement grants and contracts.
The bill amends Section 747(c)(1) of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize grants and contracts for primary care training.
It replaces the prior authorization level of $48,924,000 for FY2021–FY2025 with $49,924,000 for each fiscal year 2025–2030, extending the program and increasing the annual authorized funding by $1,000,000.
Low-controversy, small fiscal increase and reauthorization favor enactment, though standalone timing and appropriations linkage are gating factors.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that precisely adjusts authorized funding amounts and extends the fiscal-year authorization window for existing primary care training and enhancement grants and contracts. The operative change is specific and well-integrated into existing law, but the text provides minimal contextual or fiscal commentary and does not add oversight, reporting, or transition language.
Liberals prioritize workforce expansion and equity targeting
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals prioritize workforce expansion and equity targeting
Likely broadly supportive: sees even a small increase and multi‑year reauthorization as helpful to grow primary care capacity.
Would note the increase is modest and push for stronger targeting toward underserved communities and workforce equity.
Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports reauthorization and a modest funding increase for continuity.
Would seek clarity on cost, measurable outcomes, and whether the increase produces meaningful improvements.
Cautious support at best: may accept program continuation but worries about new federal spending and program expansion.
Prefers tighter scope, accountability, and offsets to limit federal footprint.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-controversy, small fiscal increase and reauthorization favor enactment, though standalone timing and appropriations linkage are gating factors.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals prioritize workforce expansion and equity targeting
Low-controversy, small fiscal increase and reauthorization favor enactment, though standalone timing and appropriations linkage are gating…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that precisely adjusts authorized funding amounts and extends the fiscal-year authorization window for existing primary care…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.