H.R. 972 (119th)Bill Overview

Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Geography and mappingLand use and conservation
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 235.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act to adjust the NCA boundary using a new map and increases the listed acreage from 48,438 to 57,728 acres. It directs the Interior Secretary (through BLM) to grant, within one year, temporary and permanent rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for a Horizon lateral water pipeline and associated infrastructure depicted on the map, outside the Conservation Area.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly and specifically amends existing statute to enlarge the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area and to authorize a named pipeline right-of-way, with clear map, acreage, implementing authority, and short implementation timelines.

This bill amends the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act to adjust the NCA boundary using a new map and increases the listed acreage from 48,438 to 57,728 acres.

It directs the Interior Secretary (through BLM) to grant, within one year, temporary and permanent rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for a Horizon lateral water pipeline and associated infrastructure depicted on the map, outside the Conservation Area.

The bill allows the Authority to excavate and dispose of materials from tunneling and requires a memorandum of understanding identifying Federal disposal sites; rights-of-way are subject to reasonable terms, must not permanently adversely affect surface resources, and may not cross designated wilderness.

Passage55/100

Targeted, low-cost land and infrastructure bill with built-in protections; success depends on resolving environmental/process objections in the Senate.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly and specifically amends existing statute to enlarge the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area and to authorize a named pipeline right-of-way, with clear map, acreage, implementing authority, and short implementation timelines.

Contention58/100

Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Permitting processFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitExpands Sloan Canyon NCA from 48,438 acres to 57,728 acres, increasing protected land.
  • Potential benefitEnables SNWA to obtain rights-of-way for the Horizon lateral pipeline, facilitating regional water transmission.
  • Permitting processRequires issuance of rights-of-way within one year, which can expedite project timelines and permitting.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesGrants rights-of-way not subject to payment of rents or other charges, potentially reducing federal receipts.
  • Potential burdenThe "notwithstanding" language waives some FLPMA provisions, possibly weakening procedural safeguards.
  • Potential burdenTunnel excavation and on‑site disposal could disturb habitat, cultural sites, or increase erosion at disposal locations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.
Progressive80%

Likely supportive of the NCA expansion because it protects additional public lands while recognizing a community water need.

Concerned about provisions that grant rights-of-way without payment and allow material disposal; would demand strong environmental safeguards and enforcement.

Views the prohibition on crossing wilderness and requirement to avoid permanent surface harms as helpful but potentially vague in practice.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Sees the bill as a pragmatic compromise balancing land protection and critical water infrastructure.

Likely to support if environmental review and clear terms are ensured, and if implementation avoids unforeseen impacts.

Will evaluate administrative capacity, cost implications, and legal defensibility before full endorsement.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Likely skeptical of expanding federally controlled conserved land and of granting ROWs without payment.

May appreciate the water infrastructure provision but objects to perceived giveaway to a regional authority and increased federal land restrictions.

Concerned about precedent limiting future development or imposing regulatory constraints.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Targeted, low-cost land and infrastructure bill with built-in protections; success depends on resolving environmental/process objections in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absence of a congressional cost estimate in the text
  • Local stakeholder and tribal support or opposition
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.

Targeted, low-cost land and infrastructure bill with built-in protections; success depends on resolving environmental/process objections in…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly and specifically amends existing statute to enlarge the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area and to authorize a named pipeline right-of-way, with clear ma…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis