- Potential benefitExpands Sloan Canyon NCA from 48,438 acres to 57,728 acres, increasing protected land.
- Potential benefitEnables SNWA to obtain rights-of-way for the Horizon lateral pipeline, facilitating regional water transmission.
- Permitting processRequires issuance of rights-of-way within one year, which can expedite project timelines and permitting.
Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 235.
This bill amends the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act to adjust the NCA boundary using a new map and increases the listed acreage from 48,438 to 57,728 acres. It directs the Interior Secretary (through BLM) to grant, within one year, temporary and permanent rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for a Horizon lateral water pipeline and associated infrastructure depicted on the map, outside the Conservation Area.
Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly and specifically amends existing statute to enlarge the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area and to authorize a named pipeline right-of-way, with clear map, acreage, implementing authority, and short implementation timelines.
This bill amends the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act to adjust the NCA boundary using a new map and increases the listed acreage from 48,438 to 57,728 acres.
It directs the Interior Secretary (through BLM) to grant, within one year, temporary and permanent rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for a Horizon lateral water pipeline and associated infrastructure depicted on the map, outside the Conservation Area.
The bill allows the Authority to excavate and dispose of materials from tunneling and requires a memorandum of understanding identifying Federal disposal sites; rights-of-way are subject to reasonable terms, must not permanently adversely affect surface resources, and may not cross designated wilderness.
Targeted, low-cost land and infrastructure bill with built-in protections; success depends on resolving environmental/process objections in the Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly and specifically amends existing statute to enlarge the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area and to authorize a named pipeline right-of-way, with clear map, acreage, implementing authority, and short implementation timelines.
Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesGrants rights-of-way not subject to payment of rents or other charges, potentially reducing federal receipts.
- Potential burdenThe "notwithstanding" language waives some FLPMA provisions, possibly weakening procedural safeguards.
- Potential burdenTunnel excavation and on‑site disposal could disturb habitat, cultural sites, or increase erosion at disposal locations.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.
Likely supportive of the NCA expansion because it protects additional public lands while recognizing a community water need.
Concerned about provisions that grant rights-of-way without payment and allow material disposal; would demand strong environmental safeguards and enforcement.
Views the prohibition on crossing wilderness and requirement to avoid permanent surface harms as helpful but potentially vague in practice.
Sees the bill as a pragmatic compromise balancing land protection and critical water infrastructure.
Likely to support if environmental review and clear terms are ensured, and if implementation avoids unforeseen impacts.
Will evaluate administrative capacity, cost implications, and legal defensibility before full endorsement.
Likely skeptical of expanding federally controlled conserved land and of granting ROWs without payment.
May appreciate the water infrastructure provision but objects to perceived giveaway to a regional authority and increased federal land restrictions.
Concerned about precedent limiting future development or imposing regulatory constraints.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, low-cost land and infrastructure bill with built-in protections; success depends on resolving environmental/process objections in the Senate.
- Absence of a congressional cost estimate in the text
- Local stakeholder and tribal support or opposition
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize conservation gain and demands strict mitigation.
Targeted, low-cost land and infrastructure bill with built-in protections; success depends on resolving environmental/process objections in…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly and specifically amends existing statute to enlarge the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area and to authorize a named pipeline right-of-way, with clear ma…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.