Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
This bill amends 38 U.S.C. 3313(g)(3)(B) to raise the VA educational assistance paid during the first year of a full-time apprenticeship or on-the-job training from 80 percent to 90 percent. It also inserts a clarifying phrase referencing use of educational assistance under the chapter.
Liberals emphasize improved veteran economic security and equity
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that precisely changes a defined statutory provision to increase first‑year apprenticeship/on‑job training educational assistance from 80% to 90% and adds a clarifying phrase to include use of educational assistance under the chapter.
This bill amends 38 U.S.C. 3313(g)(3)(B) to raise the VA educational assistance paid during the first year of a full-time apprenticeship or on-the-job training from 80 percent to 90 percent.
It also inserts a clarifying phrase referencing use of educational assistance under the chapter.
The change applies to eligible veterans in the first year of full-time apprenticeships or OJT programs.
Small, targeted veterans benefit increase with low controversy boosts chances, though fiscal scoring, offsets, and legislative calendar matter.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that precisely changes a defined statutory provision to increase first‑year apprenticeship/on‑job training educational assistance from 80% to 90% and adds a clarifying phrase to include use of educational assistance under the chapter.
Liberals emphasize improved veteran economic security and equity
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize improved veteran economic security and equity
Likely views this as a modest but meaningful expansion of benefits for veterans transitioning to civilian careers.
Would see it as improving economic security and training completion for veterans, and generally favorable as targeted support.
Generally supportive as a narrowly targeted improvement for veterans with clear goals and limited scope.
Would seek fiscal transparency and clarity on implementation, but views it as a pragmatic, incremental policy change.
May broadly support helping veterans but will be attentive to increased federal spending and precedent.
Some conservatives will back it as a focused veterans benefit; fiscal conservatives may request offsets or a sunset.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, targeted veterans benefit increase with low controversy boosts chances, though fiscal scoring, offsets, and legislative calendar matter.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize improved veteran economic security and equity
Small, targeted veterans benefit increase with low controversy boosts chances, though fiscal scoring, offsets, and legislative calendar mat…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that precisely changes a defined statutory provision to increase first‑year apprenticeship/on‑job training educational assis…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.