H.R. 9836 (119th)Bill Overview

REPLACE Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jul 22, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case f…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act to better coordinate lead removal from housing and drinking-water systems. It expands eligible uses of housing lead remediation grants to include repairs, workforce training, preservation, and requires evaluations of water-related lead hazards during housing interventions.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize child-health, preservation, and workforce benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory modernization effort that is explicit about goals, integrates cleanly into existing law, and provides meaningful operational authorities and safeguards, but it leaves significant fiscal and detailed implementation elements to agency discretion or future appropriation.

This bill amends the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act to better coordinate lead removal from housing and drinking-water systems.

It expands eligible uses of housing lead remediation grants to include repairs, workforce training, preservation, and requires evaluations of water-related lead hazards during housing interventions.

The Safe Drinking Water Act amendments broaden the service-line definition to include certain galvanized pipes, require coordination with housing lead work, and authorize EPA technical assistance for inventories, planning, and full replacements.

Passage50/100

Targeted public-health bill with bipartisan appeal but uncertain without explicit funding and possible implementation pushback.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory modernization effort that is explicit about goals, integrates cleanly into existing law, and provides meaningful operational authorities and safeguards, but it leaves significant fiscal and detailed implementation elements to agency discretion or future appropriation.

Contention68/100

Liberals emphasize child-health, preservation, and workforce benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Housing marketLandlords · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitLikely reduces childhood lead exposure by pairing paint and water hazard remediation.
  • Potential benefitCould create jobs in lead abatement, plumbing, rehabilitation, and related contractor training.
  • Housing marketAims to preserve habitable housing units that otherwise would be unsafe for occupancy.
Likely burdened
  • LandlordsIncreased compliance and remediation costs for utilities, landlords, and property owners are likely.
  • Local governmentsAdditional administrative and reporting burdens for local governments and grantees may strain capacity.
  • Potential burdenInsufficient or delayed funding could leave needed replacements or remediations incomplete.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize child-health, preservation, and workforce benefits
Progressive85%

Likely supportive because the bill modernizes federal lead programs, links paint and water hazards, and funds workforce and preservation activities protecting children.

Views capacity-building, appliance/filtration interim measures, and coordination with EPA as necessary to reach high-risk communities.

May still press for strong funding levels and equity-focused allocation rules.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable to updating lead programs and improving coordination, but cautious about costs, timelines, and administrative complexity.

Likes emphasis on technical assistance and corrective-action plans, while wanting clear accountability and realistic spending benchmarks.

Would seek clarity on funding sources, cost-sharing, and measures to avoid delays or legal conflicts with states and utilities.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical because the bill expands federal program scope, increases federal involvement in local housing and water infrastructure, and may shift costs to utilities or homeowners.

Views workforce and data-building provisions as federal growth and potential regulatory burden.

Might support narrow lead-reduction aims but oppose open-ended federal grants and stronger federal coordination without state primacy protections.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

Targeted public-health bill with bipartisan appeal but uncertain without explicit funding and possible implementation pushback.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No appropriations or cost estimate included in bill text
  • Extent of opposition from utilities or private property owners
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize child-health, preservation, and workforce benefits

Targeted public-health bill with bipartisan appeal but uncertain without explicit funding and possible implementation pushback.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory modernization effort that is explicit about goals, integrates cleanly into existing law, and provides meaningful operational authorities an…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis