H. Res. 1006 (119th)Bill Overview

Removing the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.

Simple ResolutionEconomics and Public Finance|Economics and Public Finance
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 15, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution, if adopted by the House, immediately removes the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under the authority the resolution cites. It is a House-only action that directs removal of the CBO Director pursuant to the governing statute referenced in the text. It is an internal congressional action rather than a public law enacted by both chambers and the President.

Issuing agency

Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

Passage rules

This is a simple House resolution: it only requires action by the House of Representatives and is not sent to the Senate or the President. Its practical effect depends on the statutory removal authority the resolution invokes.

H.Res.1006 is a House resolution that orders the immediate removal of the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.

It cites section 201(a)(4) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 601(a)(4)).

The resolution contains no additional findings, reasons, or appointment language.

Passage30/100

Narrow and administrable but highly politicized with no compromise features; passage hinges on a House majority and legal/constitutional questions that could provoke challenge.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative resolution that clearly states the action and cites the statutory authority, but it provides minimal procedural or follow-up detail.

Contention78/100

Progressives emphasize CBO independence and politicization risks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitAsserts the House's statutory authority to oversee and remove legislative branch officials when deemed necessary.
  • Potential benefitEnables the majority to install a new director whose analyses might better reflect congressional priorities.
  • Potential benefitMay prompt reassessment or reform of CBO analytic methods and score methodologies.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRemoves the CBO's top official, risking erosion of the agency's institutional independence and credibility.
  • Potential burdenMay politicize the budget scoring process and reduce trust in impartial fiscal estimates.
  • Potential burdenCould cause short-term disruptions to CBO operations, delaying routine reports and analyses for Congress.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize CBO independence and politicization risks
Progressive10%

Likely to view this as a partisan move that risks politicizing a key nonpartisan agency.

Would demand clear evidence and procedural safeguards before endorsing removal.

Likely resistant
Centrist45%

Wary but open to accountability if justified.

Emphasizes need for transparent reasons, due process, and minimizing damage to CBO operations and credibility.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Likely to support the resolution as congressional reassertion of oversight and a check on an allegedly biased or inaccurate CBO director.

Sees removal as a tool for accountability.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow and administrable but highly politicized with no compromise features; passage hinges on a House majority and legal/constitutional questions that could provoke challenge.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a House majority supports removal
  • Whether statute permits unilateral removal by one chamber
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize CBO independence and politicization risks

Narrow and administrable but highly politicized with no compromise features; passage hinges on a House majority and legal/constitutional qu…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative resolution that clearly states the action and cites the statutory authority, but it provides minimal procedural or follow-up deta…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis