Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
This resolution provides the House with an internal spending plan for the Committee on Homeland Security for the 119th Congress. It authorizes up to $20,466,000 from House committee salary and expense accounts, split into two equal amounts of $10,233,000 for each of the two yearly sessions. Payments must be made on vouchers authorized by the Committee and signed by its Chairman, and spending must follow rules set by the Committee on House Administration. It is an internal House measure and does not create binding law outside of House budgetary operations.
This is a simple House resolution considered and adopted by the House alone; it is not sent to the Senate or the President and only governs internal House budgeting for the specified committee.
Provides $20,466,000 for the House Committee on Homeland Security for the 119th Congress, split equally between the two one-year sessions ($10,233,000 each).
Payments require vouchers authorized by the Committee and expenditures must follow Committee on House Administration regulations.
Internal House resolution is likely to be adopted within the House but does not follow the public-law process, so becoming law is unlikely.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted administrative resolution that specifies funding amounts, availability periods, and basic approval mechanisms for Committee on Homeland Security expenses.
Debate over specific priorities: civil liberties versus enforcement emphasis
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Debate over specific priorities: civil liberties versus enforcement emphasis
This is a routine committee funding resolution that enables oversight and staff work.
Supportive in principle, but concerned about how funds are used and civil liberties implications of homeland security priorities.
Seen as a standard, procedural appropriation needed to operate a key committee.
Generally supportive if accompanied by routine oversight and accountability measures.
Favors funding the Homeland Security Committee to address threats and border issues, but may prefer different funding priorities or stricter spending limits.
Supportive if funds prioritize security outcomes.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Internal House resolution is likely to be adopted within the House but does not follow the public-law process, so becoming law is unlikely.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Debate over specific priorities: civil liberties versus enforcement emphasis
Internal House resolution is likely to be adopted within the House but does not follow the public-law process, so becoming law is unlikely.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted administrative resolution that specifies funding amounts, availability periods, and basic approval mechanisms for Committee on Homeland Se…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.