H. Res. 1034 (119th)Bill Overview

Relating to questions of privilege in the House of Representatives during the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

Congress|Congress
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 3, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The resolution bars the House Chair from entertaining privileged floor resolutions that address the conduct of a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner during the remainder of the 119th Congress unless the resolution has at least one-fifth of the House membership as cosponsors.

It also requires that an announced intention to offer such a resolution must retain that one-fifth cosponsorship for at least one legislative day, and it dispenses with oral announcements of the form of such resolutions.

The text excludes resolutions covered by clause 2(a)(3) of House Rule IX.

Passage28/100

As a short, internal House resolution it is relatively likely to pass the House if it has majority leadership backing; it does not require Senate or Presidential approval.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused procedural resolution that clearly and specifically imposes a short‑term restriction on the Chair entertaining certain privileged resolutions about Member conduct by establishing a one‑fifth cosponsorship threshold and a one‑legislative‑day maintenance requirement. It integrates directly with House Rule IX and assigns the Chair the implementing role.

Contention68/100

Progressive: emphasizes reduced accountability and minority disadvantage

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces number of immediate privileged conduct motions, conserving floor time for legislative business.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRequires broader support before lodging conduct charges, encouraging wider agreement on serious claims.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLowers potential for single-member or partisan interruptions to derail scheduled House business.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersRaises a procedural barrier that can impede timely raising of member misconduct concerns.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould delay or limit scrutiny of alleged misconduct by requiring many cosponsors first.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay concentrate practical gatekeeping power in the Chair and party leadership.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive: emphasizes reduced accountability and minority disadvantage
Progressive25%

Likely skeptical or opposed.

They would view the high cosponsor threshold as a substantial barrier to raising urgent accountability questions about member conduct on the floor, possibly insulating misconduct from expedited consideration.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Mixed but mildly favorable if paired with alternative accountability channels.

Sees procedural merit in limiting abuse of privileged motions, while wanting safeguards so serious misconduct still gets timely attention.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Generally supportive.

Views the measure as a reasonable guard against partisan or performative privileged resolutions that disrupt House business and are used as political tools.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood28/100

As a short, internal House resolution it is relatively likely to pass the House if it has majority leadership backing; it does not require Senate or Presidential approval.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of support in the House Rules Committee
  • Whether House leadership will back or oppose the change
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive: emphasizes reduced accountability and minority disadvantage

As a short, internal House resolution it is relatively likely to pass the House if it has majority leadership backing; it does not require…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused procedural resolution that clearly and specifically imposes a short‑term restriction on the Chair entertaining certain privileged resolutions about Membe…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis