H. Res. 1042 (119th)Bill Overview

Rule for H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and 1 other

Congress|CongressHouse of Representatives
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House Rules resolution (H.

Res. 1042) sets procedures for House consideration of three bills: H.R.2189 (modernize federal firearms laws), H.R.261 (exempt certain undersea fiber optic cable activities in national marine sanctuaries from duplicate authorization), and H.R.3617 (amend DOE Organization Act to secure critical energy resources).

For each bill it waives points of order, adopts committee substitutes as adopted text, limits debate to one hour (divided between committee leaders), allows one motion to recommit, and treats the bills as read.

Passage35/100

House-level procedural clearance is likely, but substantive obstacles in the Senate and possible executive scrutiny reduce overall chances.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly tailored House floor rules (agenda‑setting) resolution that provides specific, customary procedures for consideration of three bills and a defined exclusion of calendar days under the National Emergencies Act.

Contention68/100

Procedural waivers: liberals see curtailed oversight; conservatives see efficiency

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Permitting processFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersSpeeds floor consideration by adopting committee substitutes and waiving points of order.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay facilitate modernization of firearms laws to address emerging technologies and less-than-lethal weapons.
  • Permitting processCould reduce duplicative permitting and accelerate undersea fiber cable deployments in sanctuaries.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersWaiving points of order may reduce legislative scrutiny and oversight of complex provisions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLimiting debate and amendments constrains minority input and detailed legislative negotiation.
  • Federal agenciesProhibiting additional sanctuary authorizations could weaken federal environmental protections for sensitive marine hab…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Procedural waivers: liberals see curtailed oversight; conservatives see efficiency
Progressive35%

Skeptical of the resolution’s procedural rush and waivers that limit amendment and oversight.

Support or opposition to the underlying bills depends on their substantive text; environmental and civil liberties impacts matter.

The NEA timing provision is likely viewed as restricting congressional oversight of presidential emergencies.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Views the resolution as a pragmatic rules package to advance multiple policy items efficiently.

Appreciates focused debate but is wary of blanket waivers and limited amendment time.

Sees strategic value in securing critical minerals and clarifying cable permitting, but seeks balanced oversight.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Generally supportive: the rule expedites consideration, limits obstruction, and advances bills that enhance infrastructure, resource security, and firearms law clarity.

The fiber cable exemption and critical minerals provisions align with economic and national security priorities.

NEA day suspension may preserve executive emergency tools.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

House-level procedural clearance is likely, but substantive obstacles in the Senate and possible executive scrutiny reduce overall chances.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Senate willingness to consider and amend each underlying bill
  • CBO/GAO cost estimates for energy and firearms provisions
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Procedural waivers: liberals see curtailed oversight; conservatives see efficiency

House-level procedural clearance is likely, but substantive obstacles in the Senate and possible executive scrutiny reduce overall chances.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly tailored House floor rules (agenda‑setting) resolution that provides specific, customary procedures for consideration of three bills and a def…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis