Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speak…
This resolution is a non-binding statement by the House expressing support for blockchain technology and digital assets and urging U.S. leadership and a tailored regulatory framework. It does not change law, create legal rights, or require action by the Senate or the President. Instead, it records the House's views and encourages Congress and others to consider the issues raised.
As a simple resolution introduced in the House, it can be adopted by the House alone and is not sent to the Senate or the President; it does not have the force of law. The text was referred to relevant House committees for consideration of related provisions.
This is a House resolution expressing support for blockchain technology and digital assets.
It urges the United States to prioritize understanding and fostering these technologies, to lead globally, and to develop a tailored congressional framework that protects investors while encouraging domestic development.
The text also argues that digital assets can improve financial access, lower transaction costs, and aid law enforcement tracing of illicit activity.
As a House 'sense' resolution it is non‑binding and does not become law; content could influence future legislation, however.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional sense-of-Congress resolution: it clearly states support for blockchain technology and urges Congress and the United States to prioritize action, but it intentionally lacks statutory mechanisms, funding, implementation steps, and enforcement provisions.
Progressive demands stronger consumer, AML, and environmental safeguards
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressive demands stronger consumer, AML, and environmental safeguards
Cautiously supportive of innovation in principle but concerned the resolution lacks strong consumer, worker, and environmental protections.
Sees potential for financial inclusion, but wants explicit investor safeguards, anti-fraud measures, AML enforcement, and climate considerations.
Views the resolution as incomplete without concrete regulatory standards and social safeguards.
Generally supportive of promoting technological leadership while urging careful, evidence-based regulation.
Views the resolution's call for a tailored framework as sensible, but expects detailed rulemaking, cost-benefit analysis, and bipartisan process.
Sees the resolution as a constructive, nonbinding starting point.
Strongly favorable toward promoting innovation, domestic development, and limited barriers to entry.
Welcomes the resolution's emphasis on keeping development in the United States and creating a functional regulatory framework rather than heavy-handed bans.
Wary of excessive or duplicative regulation that stifles entrepreneurship.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House 'sense' resolution it is non‑binding and does not become law; content could influence future legislation, however.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressive demands stronger consumer, AML, and environmental safeguards
As a House 'sense' resolution it is non‑binding and does not become law; content could influence future legislation, however.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional sense-of-Congress resolution: it clearly states support for blockchain technology and urges Congress and the United States to prioritize action, but…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.