H. Res. 1117 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of March as "Multiple System Atrophy Awareness Month" to strengthen public awareness of this neurodegenerative disorder.

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 16, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This non-binding House resolution expresses support for designating March as "Multiple System Atrophy Awareness Month," describes the disorder and its impacts, and endorses public awareness and funding for research into Multiple System Atrophy (MSA).

The resolution cites prevalence estimates, clinical symptoms, diagnostic challenges, lack of cure, and ongoing research efforts.

Passage5/100

As a simple House resolution it's easily adoptable in the House but does not create law; becoming binding federal law is unlikely.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the condition and purpose (raising awareness), and it states the symbolic designation. It does not provide implementation details, funding mechanisms, statutory amendments, or oversight provisions, which is consistent with the typical form and scope of a House resolution of this nature.

Contention12/100

Libs want concrete, budgeted research funding; conservatives warn against implied federal spending.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay increase public awareness, potentially improving earlier recognition and diagnosis.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould mobilize philanthropic donations and advocacy group activity for research and patient support.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMight encourage researchers and funders to prioritize studies targeting this rare disorder.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersResolution is non-binding and does not itself provide or appropriate research funding.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay generate public expectations for funding that require separate appropriations to fulfill.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould divert limited advocacy or donor attention away from other diseases competing for resources.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Libs want concrete, budgeted research funding; conservatives warn against implied federal spending.
Progressive95%

Likely welcomes the resolution as a low-cost way to raise awareness and push for research funding for a neglected neurodegenerative disease.

Sees it as aligned with priorities for patient advocacy, research investment, and health equity, though would prefer clearer funding commitments.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally supportive because it is non‑controversial and promotes research and awareness for a serious condition.

Wants clarity that the resolution is symbolic and oversight of any new spending or research priorities.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely views the resolution as well‑intentioned but largely symbolic; supportive of awareness but cautious about any implied increase in federal spending.

May push for private-sector or state-led research solutions instead.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

As a simple House resolution it's easily adoptable in the House but does not create law; becoming binding federal law is unlikely.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will prioritize or schedule the resolution
  • If a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Libs want concrete, budgeted research funding; conservatives warn against implied federal spending.

As a simple House resolution it's easily adoptable in the House but does not create law; becoming binding federal law is unlikely.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the condition and purpose (raising awareness), and it states the symbolic designation. It…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis