Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
This resolution tells the House to treat the Senate amendment to the FY2026 consolidated appropriations bill as taken from the Speaker's table and to concur in that amendment by substituting the text of a specific Rules Committee print. It is a procedural action that makes a particular text the House's official disposition of the Senate amendment. It does not itself create law; it only governs the House's internal handling of the bill.
This is a House-only simple resolution used to record and implement the House's disposition of a Senate amendment; it is not sent to the President and does not have the force of law.
This House resolution (H.
Res. 1142) directs that, upon adoption, the House is considered to have taken up H.R. 7147 (further consolidated appropriations for FY2026) with the Senate amendment and to have concurred in that amendment by substituting the text of Rules Committee Print 119–21.
It is a procedural disposition so the House can approve the Senate amendment with a specific House amendment text.
House resolutions are internal procedural actions and do not become federal law; the resolution is likely to be adopted but not enacted as law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed House disposition resolution. It clearly states its purpose and provides a specific, limited mechanism to effect the House's disposition of the Senate amendment by reference to an identified Rules Committee Print.
Process transparency: liberals/centrists want CBO scoring; conservatives fear hidden spending.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Process transparency: liberals/centrists want CBO scoring; conservatives fear hidden spending.
Progressive-leaning observers will judge this resolution primarily by the content of the substituted appropriations text.
They will welcome a clean, prompt passage if it secures funding for social programs and protections, but worry about concealed rollbacks or missing priorities.
A pragmatic centrists see this as a routine procedural step to enact consolidated appropriations and prefer avoiding shutdowns.
They will favor the resolution if it balances fiscal responsibility with necessary program funding and allows adequate budgeting transparency.
Mainstream conservatives will evaluate based on spending totals and policy riders in the substituted text.
They may oppose the procedural shortcut if it increases discretionary spending or contains regulatory or social-policy provisions they oppose.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
House resolutions are internal procedural actions and do not become federal law; the resolution is likely to be adopted but not enacted as law.
The House formally adopted this resolution. A resolution applies only to the House and does not require the other chamber's approval or the President's signature — this vote settles the matter.
A resolution is a formal statement of opinion or decision by the chamber.
Debate was cut short. The House will proceed directly to a vote on the underlying question.
In the House, this ends debate and forces an immediate vote on the main question.
Process transparency: liberals/centrists want CBO scoring; conservatives fear hidden spending.
House resolutions are internal procedural actions and do not become federal law; the resolution is likely to be adopted but not enacted as…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed House disposition resolution. It clearly states its purpose and provides a specific, limited mechanism to effect the House's disposition…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.