H. Res. 1144 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting recognition of 2026 as the "International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists".

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Mar 27, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution expresses support for recognizing 2026 as the “International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists.” It outlines the importance of U.S. and global rangelands and pastoralists for ecology, food production, and rural communities, and encourages federal agencies, universities, and organizations to engage in education, research, and outreach related to rangeland management.

The resolution is a nonbinding statement, with no appropriations or regulatory changes specified.

Passage0/100

This House resolution is nonbinding and not a vehicle to create law; it can be adopted by the House but does not become statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly articulates the rationale for recognizing 2026 as the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists and offers general encouragement for related activities, while appropriately omitting binding directives, appropriations, or statutory changes.

Contention12/100

Liberals stress conservation, Indigenous rights, and climate specifics

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
WorkersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersRecognition may legitimize grazing-based wildfire risk reduction strategies.
  • WorkersInternational collaboration and information sharing on pastoralist management may increase.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRaises public awareness leading to more education and outreach on sustainable rangeland practices.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe resolution is symbolic and provides no funding or regulatory changes.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould be used to justify expanded grazing that harms habitat or biodiversity.
  • Federal agenciesMight influence agency priorities toward grazing interests over stricter conservation measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress conservation, Indigenous rights, and climate specifics
Progressive80%

Likely viewed positively for highlighting ecosystems, biodiversity, and rural stewardship while supporting research and outreach.

Some progressives may note omissions like specific climate mitigation measures or Indigenous land rights and see those as missed opportunities.

Overall supportive but with cautious expectations about concrete outcomes.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Seen as a low-cost, noncontroversial statement supporting research, education, and multi-use land management.

Appreciated for recognizing rural economies and ecosystem services while avoiding regulatory mandates.

Would watch for potential unfunded agency activities or mission creep.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Likely welcomes federal recognition of ranchers, pastoralists, and multiple-use management.

Views the resolution as supportive of private landowners and local stewardship, and avoids expanding federal regulation.

Some conservatives may question UN involvement but generally favor honoring domestic ranching heritage.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This House resolution is nonbinding and not a vehicle to create law; it can be adopted by the House but does not become statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House leadership will prioritize floor consideration
  • If a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress conservation, Indigenous rights, and climate specifics

This House resolution is nonbinding and not a vehicle to create law; it can be adopted by the House but does not become statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly articulates the rationale for recognizing 2026 as the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis