H. Res. 116 (119th)Bill Overview

Condemning the pardons for individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police Officers.

Simple ResolutionCrime and Law Enforcement|Assault and harassment offensesCrime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution formally states the House of Representatives' disapproval of pardons for people convicted of assaulting Capitol Police officers. It is an expression of the House's opinion and does not create or change law. It does not prevent the President from issuing pardons or affect court decisions. If adopted, it records the House's stance but has no direct legal effect.

Passage rules

As a House simple resolution, it only needs passage in the House and is not sent to the Senate or the President. It is non-binding and cannot alter presidential pardon authority.

This House resolution states that the House of Representatives disapproves of any pardons for persons convicted of assaulting Capitol Police officers.

It is a simple, nonbinding condemnation of pardons for those specific convictions and does not create legal penalties or change pardon law.

Passage0/100

This is a non‑binding House resolution that does not create law; it cannot become law as drafted.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise single-paragraph House resolution that appropriately functions as a formal expression of disapproval; it states the House position clearly but contains no background findings, legal cross-references, enforcement mechanisms, or fiscal analysis, which are not required for this type of measure.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize accountability and officer protection

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesReinforces accountability for assaults on federal law enforcement, potentially deterring future attacks.
  • Potential benefitSignals institutional support for Capitol Police and acknowledges victims' harms.
  • Potential benefitAffirms a congressional normative stance against pardons in these assault cases.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay be perceived as exerting pressure on presidential clemency, raising separation‑of‑powers concerns.
  • Potential burdenDoes not change legal authority but may politicize individual pardon decisions and mercy determinations.
  • Potential burdenCould inflame political tensions and public polarization without producing legal remedies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize accountability and officer protection
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive because it affirms accountability for political violence and defends law enforcement safety.

It aligns with commitments to rule of law and protecting public servants, while remaining symbolic rather than changing law.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but cautious; views the resolution as a reasonable symbolic statement defending officers and the rule of law.

Concerned about separation of powers implications and the resolution's political optics.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Divided reaction: some welcome condemnation of assaults, but many worry the resolution criticizes presidential clemency and targets political allies.

Skepticism about Congress passing symbolic rebukes of pardon decisions.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a non‑binding House resolution that does not create law; it cannot become law as drafted.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of formal House majority support
  • Whether Senate will adopt a companion resolution
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize accountability and officer protection

This is a non‑binding House resolution that does not create law; it cannot become law as drafted.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise single-paragraph House resolution that appropriately functions as a formal expression of disapproval; it states the House position clearly but contains n…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis