H. Res. 1171 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the designation of the week of April 20 through April 24, 2026, as "National Home Visiting Week".

Social Welfare|Social Welfare
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 14, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution designates April 20–24, 2026, as “National Home Visiting Week” and affirms support for the goals and ideals of that week.

The text cites evidence and statistics about the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program, its reach, and benefits for children, families, workforce, and Tribal communities.

The resolution is symbolic and does not create new funding or legal requirements.

Passage0/100

House simple resolutions are expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content-wise it will likely be adopted by the House but not enacted as statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies contextual justification with program references and statistics, and precisely designates the week and name it intends to honor.

Contention20/100

Liberal emphasizes funding and equity for expansion; conservatives worry about federal role.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Local governmentsRaises public awareness of home visiting benefits and available local programs.
  • Local governmentsMay increase referrals to local services through outreach and publicity during the designated week.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould improve recruitment and retention by publicly recognizing home visitors and supervisors.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIs purely symbolic and creates no new federal funding, legal rights, or regulatory changes.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay raise public expectations without guaranteeing expanded services or staffing.
  • Targeted stakeholdersDiverts legislative time to a non-binding resolution rather than substantive appropriations or reforms.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes funding and equity for expansion; conservatives worry about federal role.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: views the resolution as positive recognition of evidence-based home visiting and a reinforcement of the 2022 reauthorization.

Would see it as helpful for public awareness, equity for Tribal communities, and advocacy for sustained or increased funding for proven programs.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but pragmatic: sees the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan acknowledgment of early-childhood supports.

Views it mainly as symbolic and would want clarity on measurable outcomes, oversight, and fiscal implications before backing substantive expansions.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Cautiously accepting but reserved: the resolution is a symbolic recognition of family support services, which many conservatives find uncontroversial.

However, there is concern about federal program emphasis, potential justification for further federal spending, and preference for state/local solutions.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolutions are expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content-wise it will likely be adopted by the House but not enacted as statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will consider it under suspension calendar
  • Existence of a companion Senate resolution
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes funding and equity for expansion; conservatives worry about federal role.

House simple resolutions are expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content-wise it will likely be adopted by the House but not…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies contextual justification with program references and statisti…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis