H. Res. 1194 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing April 2026 as "Distracted Driving Awareness Month" and promoting efforts to help prevent tragic and preventable crashes, deaths, and injuries caused by distracted driving.

Simple ResolutionTransportation and Public Works|Transportation and Public Works
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Apr 20, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution recognizes April 2026 as Distracted Driving Awareness Month and encourages actions to reduce crashes, deaths, and injuries from distracted driving. It expresses the House's support for public education, enforcement, and technology efforts led by federal, state, and local partners. The resolution does not create new law or authorize spending; it is a formal statement of support and encouragement.

Passage rules

This is a House simple resolution, so it would be adopted only by the House of Representatives and does not go to the President. It is non-binding and does not change federal law or create enforceable requirements.

House Resolution 1194 designates April 2026 as "Distracted Driving Awareness Month" and promotes efforts to reduce crashes, deaths, and injuries caused by distracted driving.

The resolution expresses support for DOT, NHTSA, state and local agencies, and law enforcement education and enforcement campaigns, and urges drivers to use "Do Not Disturb" features and put phones away while driving.

It is a non-binding resolution without regulatory text or funding provisions.

Passage0/100

As a House simple resolution of recognition it does not create law; adoption in the House is likely but it cannot become statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the problem, cites relevant data, and uses appropriate nonbinding language to express support and encourage action by federal, State, and local actors.

Contention15/100

Progressive wants funding and stronger regulatory steps.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased public awareness could reduce distracted driving incidents and related crashes, injuries, and fatalities.
  • Potential benefitEndorses DOT, NHTSA, and law enforcement campaigns, improving coordination of outreach and enforcement efforts.
  • Potential benefitEncourages enabling Do Not Disturb and similar features, potentially lowering phone-related visual and manual distracti…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNon-binding resolution does not authorize funding, so direct program effects are limited.
  • Potential burdenEncouraging enforcement could increase traffic stops, raising concerns about unequal enforcement and civil liberties.
  • Potential burdenEmphasis on personal behavior may divert attention from infrastructure, vehicle safety technology, or systemic measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants funding and stronger regulatory steps.
Progressive70%

Generally supportive of efforts to reduce preventable deaths and injuries, but disappointed the resolution is only symbolic and lacks concrete measures.

Would prefer explicit calls for funding, stronger nationwide laws, technology accountability, or equity safeguards in enforcement.

Still sees value in public education and campaigns that complement broader safety policy.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Supportive of a low-cost, nonbinding resolution that promotes safety and coordination across levels of government.

Views it as a practical step to reinforce existing DOT and NHTSA efforts, though notes symbolic measures need evidence-based follow-up.

Will watch for accompanying funding or policy proposals.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely to support the resolution's safety focus and emphasis on personal responsibility and state/local roles.

Generally approves nonbinding federal statements that encourage safer behavior.

May be cautious about any implied expansion of federal power or new enforcement burdens, although this bill does not create new mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a House simple resolution of recognition it does not create law; adoption in the House is likely but it cannot become statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership schedules floor consideration
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants funding and stronger regulatory steps.

As a House simple resolution of recognition it does not create law; adoption in the House is likely but it cannot become statute.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the problem, cites relevant data, and uses appropriate nonbinding language to express support and e…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis