- Targeted stakeholdersIncreases public recognition and morale among specialized instructional support personnel.
- StudentsHighlights school-based mental health and related supports for students and communities.
- Local governmentsEncourages federal, state, and local policymakers to coordinate awareness and outreach efforts.
Supporting the designation of the week of April 27 through May 1, 2026, as "National Specialized Instructional Support Personnel Appreciation Week".
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This House resolution designates April 27 through May 1, 2026, as "National Specialized Instructional Support Personnel Appreciation Week." It lists and recognizes more than one million school-based specialized instructional support personnel and their roles.
The resolution commends these workers, encourages policymakers to raise awareness, and urges sharing evidence-based best practices.
It is a non-binding statement of support without funding or regulatory directives.
As a House simple resolution it is nonbinding and cannot become law; passage in the House is likely but it does not create statutory law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly designates a specific week and enumerates categories of specialized instructional support personnel to be recognized. It contains appropriate level of specificity for naming and describing the recognition but intentionally omits substantive implementation, funding, statutory changes, or oversight mechanisms.
Liberal emphasizes need to convert recognition into funding
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersIs a symbolic, nonbinding resolution that provides no new funding or regulatory changes.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay be viewed as diverting attention from concrete solutions to staffing and funding shortfalls.
- Local governmentsCould lead to uneven local implementation and recognition across districts with different resources.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberal emphasizes need to convert recognition into funding
Likely strongly supportive of the recognition and the emphasis on mental health, equity, and multidisciplinary supports in schools.
Views the resolution as a positive affirmation of often under-resourced professionals who advance student well-being.
Will note that the text is symbolic and does not provide funding or staffing mandates.
Generally favorable because the resolution is nonbinding, bipartisan, and low cost.
Sees value in acknowledging roles that support student learning and safety while noting the statement's symbolic nature.
Will appreciate the encouragement of sharing best practices but will seek concrete follow-up like pilots or evidence-based programs.
Likely supportive of a nonbinding, appreciative resolution for school staff, especially given safety and mental health language.
May be cautious about any implied federal role or precedent for more spending.
Prefers emphasis on local control, voluntary best-practice sharing, and avoidance of mandates or new federal programs.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House simple resolution it is nonbinding and cannot become law; passage in the House is likely but it does not create statutory law.
- Whether House leadership will schedule floor consideration
- Presence and degree of bipartisan cosponsorship
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberal emphasizes need to convert recognition into funding
As a House simple resolution it is nonbinding and cannot become law; passage in the House is likely but it does not create statutory law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly designates a specific week and enumerates categories of specialized instructional support personnel to be r…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.