Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives support for designating May 8 through May 17, 2026, as National American Birding Week. It is a non-binding statement that recognizes birding's economic and conservation importance, applauds coordinated conservation efforts, and encourages public participation in birding events. It does not create law or require action by other branches of government.
This is a simple resolution acted on only by the House of Representatives; it does not go to the Senate or the President and does not have the force of law. It is adopted under the House's regular procedures for simple resolutions.
This House resolution expresses support for designating May 8–17, 2026, as “National American Birding Week.” It highlights migratory bird numbers and declines, cites the economic value of birding, and commends coordinated conservation and local events such as the Biggest Week in American Birding.
The resolution is advisory and encourages public participation in birding events and conservation awareness.
As a House simple resolution it is symbolic and not designed to become law; passage in the House is likely but it does not create binding law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses the usual nonbinding language to designate and promote a national week of birding.
Liberals want substantive conservation measures beyond symbolism
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals want substantive conservation measures beyond symbolism
Generally favorable; views the resolution as a useful awareness and conservation signal.
Would praise emphasis on declining migratory bird populations and cross-sector conservation partnerships.
Likely to want this symbolic step paired with concrete habitat protections and funding for conservation science.
Supportive but pragmatic; sees the resolution as a low-cost way to promote tourism and conservation awareness.
Values the cited economic benefits and cooperative approach among government, nonprofits, and businesses.
Would prefer clear metrics or follow-up to ensure awareness translates into effective conservation.
Generally not opposed; likely to view the resolution as a harmless, pro-commerce recognition of a recreational activity.
Appreciates economic tourism claims and local event support.
Some conservatives may question federal involvement in symbolic designations or prefer state/local leadership.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House simple resolution it is symbolic and not designed to become law; passage in the House is likely but it does not create binding law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals want substantive conservation measures beyond symbolism
As a House simple resolution it is symbolic and not designed to become law; passage in the House is likely but it does not create binding l…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses the usual nonbinding language to designate and promote a national week of…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.