H. Res. 128 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for designation of the month of February 2025 as "National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month".

Simple ResolutionCrime and Law Enforcement|Assault and harassment offensesCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Feb 12, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This non‑binding House resolution expresses support for designating February 2025 as National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month. It cites CDC and other research on types and prevalence of teen dating violence, highlights technology‑facilitated abuse, references evidence‑based prevention programs and relevant federal statutes, and calls on communities, schools, parents, law enforcement, and organizations to observe the month with appropriate awareness and prevention activities.

Why people may split

Liberty to prioritize prevention versus conservatives' concern about federal influence

Watch point

Commemorative resolutions routinely pass by voice vote; topic noncontroversial and contains no fiscal impacts.

This non‑binding House resolution expresses support for designating February 2025 as National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month.

It cites CDC and other research on types and prevalence of teen dating violence, highlights technology‑facilitated abuse, references evidence‑based prevention programs and relevant federal statutes, and calls on communities, schools, parents, law enforcement, and organizations to observe the month with appropriate awareness and prevention activities.

Passage5/100

Simple House resolutions are symbolic and do not create law; likely to pass House but not to become statute.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention15/100

Liberty to prioritize prevention versus conservatives' concern about federal influence

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
SchoolsLocal governments · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of teen dating violence, potentially increasing reporting and help-seeking.
  • SchoolsEncourages schools and nonprofits to implement or expand prevention curricula and outreach programs.
  • Potential benefitMay increase demand for training, counseling, and prevention services, potentially creating related jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is symbolic and creates no new funding for services or programs.
  • Local governmentsLocal schools or agencies may face pressure to add programming without allocated funds.
  • Federal agenciesPotential duplication with existing federal, state, and nonprofit initiatives could waste resources.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty to prioritize prevention versus conservatives' concern about federal influence
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive; views the resolution as a useful public‑health and prevention signal that centers victims and evidence‑based programming.

Sees naming a month as low‑risk, high‑visibility promotion of education and services.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive but pragmatic; views the resolution as noncontroversial awareness raising.

Will look for concrete, costed follow‑up actions and measurable outcomes rather than symbolic action alone.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Tends to be supportive overall because the resolution is symbolic and addresses youth safety.

Some reservations may arise about federal messaging, curriculum influence, and gendered framing of impacts.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Simple House resolutions are symbolic and do not create law; likely to pass House but not to become statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion or similar Senate resolution will be introduced
  • Potential localized objections to specific statutory citations or language
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty to prioritize prevention versus conservatives' concern about federal influence

Simple House resolutions are symbolic and do not create law; likely to pass House but not to become statute.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Expressing support for designation of the month of February 20…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis