H. Res. 1319 (119th)Bill Overview

Ending child poverty.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 21, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a statement by the House of Representatives expressing its views on child poverty and urging actions like establishing a national child poverty reduction target and increasing investments for children. It does not create new laws or change existing programs; it simply records the House's recommendations and priorities. The resolution encourages federal, state, territorial, and local policymakers to follow its direction but has no binding legal force.

This House resolution expresses congressional support for ending child poverty by establishing a national child poverty reduction target and backing investments similar to the 2021 expanded Child Tax Credit.

It urges increased federal spending on children, expanded access to benefits for nonfilers, immigrant families, and territories, and supports affordable early childhood education, universal pre-K–12 public education, and protections for students with disabilities and marginalized groups.

The resolution is a non-binding statement of policy goals and encouragement to states, territories, and localities to follow its direction.

Passage0/100

As a House simple resolution it is nonbinding and does not become law; adoption would be a policy statement only.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-documented and rhetorically specific statement of policy goals and factual findings but stops short of operational detail. It functions as a congressional expression of support for ending child poverty and for certain policy directions rather than a blueprint for action.

Contention66/100

Scope and permanence of Child Tax Credit expansion

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased investments could reduce child poverty rates and improve children's long-term earnings and well-being.
  • Potential benefitExpanding childcare and early education could create jobs in the early childhood workforce and related services.
  • Potential benefitBetter child health and education access could lower future health care and criminal justice costs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesSubstantive policy changes would require new legislation and funding, potentially increasing federal deficits or taxes.
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is nonbinding and provides no appropriations, so intended outcomes depend on uncertain future laws.
  • Federal agenciesExpanding federal programs and eligibility could increase regulatory and administrative burdens for states and provider…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope and permanence of Child Tax Credit expansion
Progressive95%

Strongly supportive.

Views the resolution as a necessary moral and evidence-based call to restore and expand 2021-level investments like the Child Tax Credit.

Sees its emphasis on immigrant inclusion, territories, early childhood, and racial disparities as positive and long overdue.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious.

Supports the goal of reducing child poverty and acknowledges evidence for cash supports (CTC), while noting the resolution lacks costed policy specifics and implementation details.

Wants bipartisan, fiscally responsible plans to follow.

Leans supportive
Conservative20%

Skeptical to opposed.

Agrees child poverty is a problem but objects to permanent large-scale entitlements without offsets and to extending benefits broadly to immigrants and territories.

Views many provisions as federal overreach and budgetary risk.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a House simple resolution it is nonbinding and does not become law; adoption would be a policy statement only.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House majority will bring the resolution to a floor vote
  • Political opposition intensity to permanent CTC language
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope and permanence of Child Tax Credit expansion

As a House simple resolution it is nonbinding and does not become law; adoption would be a policy statement only.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-documented and rhetorically specific statement of policy goals and factual findings but stops short of operational detail. It functions as a congressional e…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis