H. Res. 136 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of February 2025 as "Hawaiian Language Month" or "'Olelo Hawai'i Month".

Simple ResolutionNative Americans|Native Americans
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This concurrent resolution expresses the House's support for designating February 2025 as "Hawaiian Language Month" (ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi Month), affirms commitment to preserving and promoting the Hawaiian language consistent with the Native American Languages Act, and urges public celebration and related activities. It cites historical suppression of ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi, recent revitalization efforts, and federal and state actions supporting Indigenous language preservation.

Why people may split

Progressive wants stronger follow-up funding and concrete action

Watch point

Short, symbolic resolution is typically easy to adopt in the House by voice or unanimous consent.

This concurrent resolution expresses the House's support for designating February 2025 as "Hawaiian Language Month" (ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi Month), affirms commitment to preserving and promoting the Hawaiian language consistent with the Native American Languages Act, and urges public celebration and related activities.

It cites historical suppression of ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi, recent revitalization efforts, and federal and state actions supporting Indigenous language preservation.

Passage5/100

House simple resolution is unlikely to become federal law because it is nonbinding and not a vehicle for statutory enactment.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention28/100

Progressive wants stronger follow-up funding and concrete action

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Schools · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national awareness and visibility for the Hawaiian language and its revitalization efforts.
  • SchoolsEncourages schools, cultural groups, and communities to host educational and celebratory events in February.
  • Federal agenciesAffirms federal policy alignment with Indigenous language preservation and past federal grants.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs largely ceremonial and does not appropriate funds or create new legal obligations.
  • Federal agenciesMay create public expectations for additional federal funding or programmatic action that are not authorized.
  • Potential burdenSome may view legislative time spent on a symbolic resolution as less substantive than lawmaking.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants stronger follow-up funding and concrete action
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive as a recognition of Indigenous language rights and cultural restoration.

Views the resolution as a positive symbolic step that aligns with efforts to address historical injustices and bolster language revitalization programs.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive of a nonbinding recognition that honors cultural heritage and has low fiscal impact.

Sees the resolution as a modest, symbolic measure but would look for clarity that it imposes no new mandates or costs.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Mixed to somewhat skeptical: many conservatives will view the resolution as an innocuous cultural recognition, but others may object to symbolic federal statements or the historical framing.

Concerns center on identity-based government actions and precedent for federal involvement.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

House simple resolution is unlikely to become federal law because it is nonbinding and not a vehicle for statutory enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will adopt the resolution by voice/unanimous consent
  • If a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants stronger follow-up funding and concrete action

House simple resolution is unlikely to become federal law because it is nonbinding and not a vehicle for statutory enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Expressing support for the designation of February 2025 as "Ha…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis