H. Res. 145 (119th)Bill Overview

Impeaching Paul Adam Engelmayer, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Simple ResolutionLaw|Law
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 21, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This resolution (H. Res. 145) impeaches U.S. District Judge Paul A.

Why people may split

Liberty of judiciary vs. hold judges accountable for overreach

Watch point

Impeachment of a judge is politically charged; success in the House often depends on partisan alignment and evidentiary support, which the text itself does not provide.

This resolution (H.

Res. 145) impeaches U.S. District Judge Paul A.

Engelmayer for 'high crimes and misdemeanors,' charging him with abuse of power.

Passage30/100

Narrow, politically charged impeachment has low procedural and evidentiary likelihood to clear a supermajority trial conviction; House passage depends on party-line dynamics and evidence not contained in text.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention68/100

Liberty of judiciary vs. hold judges accountable for overreach

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitSupports may argue impeachment enforces accountability for judicial overreach and oath violations.
  • Federal agenciesMay deter future judges from issuing broad restraints on executive access to federal systems.
  • Potential benefitCould restore or protect executive branch access to Treasury payment and identification systems.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCritics may say the bill politicizes impeachment and threatens judicial independence and impartiality.
  • Potential burdenMay create a chilling effect causing judges to avoid issuing necessary restraints or rulings.
  • Potential burdenCould erode public confidence in an impartial judiciary if removals follow policy disagreements.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty of judiciary vs. hold judges accountable for overreach
Progressive10%

Likely views the resolution as a partisan attack that risks undermining judicial independence and privacy protections.

They would demand clear, compelling evidence that the judge engaged in corruption rather than adjudicated within his legal authority.

Likely resistant
Centrist40%

Tends to be cautious: supportive of accountability but concerned impeachment over a judicial order risks dangerous precedent.

Will want fact-finding and bipartisan standards proving wilful misconduct beyond a controversial ruling.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Likely views the resolution favorably as necessary to check a judge perceived to have blocked executive access and exceeded authority.

Sees impeachment as appropriate if the judge used office for political ends.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow, politically charged impeachment has low procedural and evidentiary likelihood to clear a supermajority trial conviction; House passage depends on party-line dynamics and evidence not contained in text.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Presence and strength of supporting evidence beyond allegations
  • Level of support within the House (party-line vs bipartisan)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty of judiciary vs. hold judges accountable for overreach

Narrow, politically charged impeachment has low procedural and evidentiary likelihood to clear a supermajority trial conviction; House pass…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Impeaching Paul Adam Engelmayer, United States District Court…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis