H. Res. 156 (119th)Bill Overview

Honoring the 25th anniversary of the partnership between Guam and the Republic of the Philippines under the State Partnership Program.

Simple ResolutionInternational Affairs|International Affairs
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consi…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement by the House recognizing the 25th anniversary of the Guam-Philippines partnership and expressing appreciation and support for their cooperation. It does not create legal rights, change U.S. law, or provide funding. It formally records the House's views and encouragement for the State Partnership Program and related defense cooperation.

Passage rules

This is a House simple resolution acted on by the House of Representatives alone; it does not require Senate approval or the President's signature and has no force of law.

This House resolution honors the 25th anniversary of the State Partnership Program between the Guam National Guard and the Armed Forces of the Philippines.

It enumerates past joint activities (training, disaster response, infrastructure work), praises the partnership’s role in regional security and deterrence, and expresses continued support for the program and possible similar partnerships with other U.S. states and territories.

The resolution is symbolic and contains no appropriation or new authorities.

Passage0/100

House simple resolutions are non‑binding expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content would face no legal obstacles but cannot become statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a standard commemorative House resolution: it provides clear purpose and supporting facts, and its limited provisions (recognitions, expressions of support, and commendations) are appropriate in scope and detail for a symbolic instrument.

Contention15/100

Liberal emphasizes humanitarian and rights safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitStrengthens U.S.-Philippine security cooperation and military interoperability through sustained training and exercises.
  • Potential benefitImproves disaster response and emergency preparedness through joint exercises and infrastructure reconstruction experie…
  • Potential benefitReinforces diplomatic ties and symbolic commitment, potentially facilitating additional bilateral programs and assistan…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay be perceived as escalatory by China, raising regional tensions and risk of diplomatic friction.
  • Potential burdenCould legitimize expanded U.S. military presence, increasing the chance of involvement in regional disputes.
  • Potential burdenOffers only symbolic recognition without appropriations, potentially distracting from needed concrete policy or aid.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes humanitarian and rights safeguards
Progressive80%

Likely views the resolution positively for highlighting disaster response, capacity building, and regional cooperation.

Would appreciate humanitarian and training aspects while expressing caution about military escalation framing and ensuring human rights and transparency.

Overall supportive but wary of language emphasizing increased U.S. military presence.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Sees the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan affirmation of a long-standing military-to-military partnership.

Values disaster relief, capacity building, and deterrence balance.

Wants clarity that this is symbolic, with prudent oversight if activities expand or require funding.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Likely strongly supportive, viewing the resolution as recognition of a valuable security partnership that helps deter Chinese aggression and bolster American influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Appreciates emphasis on defense cooperation and the Mutual Defense Treaty.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolutions are non‑binding expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content would face no legal obstacles but cannot become statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether Senate will adopt a companion or consider similar language
  • Potential procedural delays in House committee referral or scheduling
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes humanitarian and rights safeguards

House simple resolutions are non‑binding expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content would face no legal obstacles but cannot…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a standard commemorative House resolution: it provides clear purpose and supporting facts, and its limited provisions (recognitions, expressions of suppo…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis