H. Res. 164 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 23) permitting parental remote voting by proxy, and for other purposes.

Simple ResolutionFamilies|FamiliesHouse of Representatives
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 294, H. Res. 164 is laid on the table.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This resolution is a House Rules motion to bring H. Res. 23 (which would permit parental remote voting by proxy) directly to the floor for an up-or-down disposition.

Why people may split

Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns

Watch point

Procedural rules are relatively easy to pass when a controlling coalition exists; underlying policy could generate opposition.

This resolution is a House Rules motion to bring H.

Res. 23 (which would permit parental remote voting by proxy) directly to the floor for an up-or-down disposition.

It sets debate at one hour, equally divided and controlled by the Rules Committee chair and ranking member, waives intervening motions or points of order, and exempts clause 1(c) of House Rule XIX from applying to consideration of H.

Passage0/100

This is a House internal procedural resolution to schedule floor consideration, not a statute; it does not become law.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention60/100

Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitAccelerates floor action on parental remote voting, shortening time to a final House decision.
  • Potential benefitIf later adopted, proxy voting could reduce childcare and travel burdens for eligible members.
  • Potential benefitLimits dilatory motions and amendments, enabling quicker legislative throughput for this measure.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCurtails opportunities for extended debate and floor amendments on the substantive proxy voting proposal.
  • Potential burdenWaiving a rule clause may relax normal procedural constraints during consideration.
  • Potential burdenExpedited consideration can reduce public scrutiny and detailed legislative deliberation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns
Progressive50%

Cautiously mixed: supportive of family-friendly voting access in principle, but concerned about the fast-tracked process and waived safeguards.

Wants substantive protections and oversight before endorsing proxy-voting changes.

Split reaction
Centrist60%

Pragmatic: appreciates efficient floor consideration and balanced debate time but worries about waivers and limited amendment opportunities.

Will judge mostly on H.

Res. 23's details.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Generally favorable: values efficient consideration and supports enabling members with parental responsibilities to participate.

Sees the rule as a useful procedural vehicle to pass H.

Res. 23 quickly.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a House internal procedural resolution to schedule floor consideration, not a statute; it does not become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Substantive provisions and controversy level of H. Res. 23
  • Actual level of support among House members for consideration
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns

This is a House internal procedural resolution to schedule floor consideration, not a statute; it does not become law.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 23)…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis