- Potential benefitAccelerates floor action on parental remote voting, shortening time to a final House decision.
- Potential benefitIf later adopted, proxy voting could reduce childcare and travel burdens for eligible members.
- Potential benefitLimits dilatory motions and amendments, enabling quicker legislative throughput for this measure.
Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 23) permitting parental remote voting by proxy, and for other purposes.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 294, H. Res. 164 is laid on the table.
This resolution is a House Rules motion to bring H. Res. 23 (which would permit parental remote voting by proxy) directly to the floor for an up-or-down disposition.
Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns
Procedural rules are relatively easy to pass when a controlling coalition exists; underlying policy could generate opposition.
This resolution is a House Rules motion to bring H.
Res. 23 (which would permit parental remote voting by proxy) directly to the floor for an up-or-down disposition.
It sets debate at one hour, equally divided and controlled by the Rules Committee chair and ranking member, waives intervening motions or points of order, and exempts clause 1(c) of House Rule XIX from applying to consideration of H.
This is a House internal procedural resolution to schedule floor consideration, not a statute; it does not become law.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenCurtails opportunities for extended debate and floor amendments on the substantive proxy voting proposal.
- Potential burdenWaiving a rule clause may relax normal procedural constraints during consideration.
- Potential burdenExpedited consideration can reduce public scrutiny and detailed legislative deliberation.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns
Cautiously mixed: supportive of family-friendly voting access in principle, but concerned about the fast-tracked process and waived safeguards.
Wants substantive protections and oversight before endorsing proxy-voting changes.
Pragmatic: appreciates efficient floor consideration and balanced debate time but worries about waivers and limited amendment opportunities.
Will judge mostly on H.
Res. 23's details.
Generally favorable: values efficient consideration and supports enabling members with parental responsibilities to participate.
Sees the rule as a useful procedural vehicle to pass H.
Res. 23 quickly.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
This is a House internal procedural resolution to schedule floor consideration, not a statute; it does not become law.
- Substantive provisions and controversy level of H. Res. 23
- Actual level of support among House members for consideration
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals stress procedural scrutiny and accountability concerns
This is a House internal procedural resolution to schedule floor consideration, not a statute; it does not become law.
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 23)…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.