H. Res. 189 (119th)Bill Overview

Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas.

Congress|CongressGovernment ethics and transparency, public corruption
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution formally censures Representative Al Green for interrupting the President during the March 4, 2025 joint session.

It finds his conduct disrupted proceedings and notes he was removed by the Sergeant at Arms.

The resolution directs Representative Green to present himself in the well for a public reading of the censure by the Speaker.

Passage60/100

Narrow, administrable House disciplinary resolution has reasonable chance of adoption by the House but faces partisan uncertainty; it is not a statute.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention68/100

Progressives emphasize civil liberties and chilling dissent risks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersReinforces congressional decorum and order during formal proceedings.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a public, institutional record holding a member accountable for disruptive conduct.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay deter similar interruptions during future joint sessions and addresses.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay be viewed as suppressing expressive dissent by an elected representative.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould reduce effective representation if disciplinary actions limit member participation.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRisks selective or partisan use of disciplinary tools, creating perceived unfairness.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil liberties and chilling dissent risks
Progressive30%

Likely views the censure as an excessive punishment for a protest act and a potential chilling precedent for dissent.

Would still acknowledge that interrupting a joint session breached chamber decorum and required some response.

Likely resistant
Centrist75%

Will likely accept censure as a reasonable, measured response to a clear breach of decorum while emphasizing consistency.

Concerned about precedent and partisan application, but supportive of accountability for disrupting official proceedings.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly supports the censure as an appropriate enforcement of decorum and authority.

Views the action as necessary to uphold respect for the Presidency and the House's rules.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, administrable House disciplinary resolution has reasonable chance of adoption by the House but faces partisan uncertainty; it is not a statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Day-to-day partisan dynamics in the House majority
  • Public and media reaction shaping member votes
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil liberties and chilling dissent risks

Narrow, administrable House disciplinary resolution has reasonable chance of adoption by the House but faces partisan uncertainty; it is no…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas..

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis