Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
This resolution is a formal censure by the House of Representatives. It publicly rebukes Representative Al Green for interrupting the joint session and directs him to appear in the well so the Speaker can read the censure aloud. A censure is an official statement of disapproval under House rules and does not remove a member from office, change their pay, or create criminal liability. The effect is disciplinary and reputational, enforced inside the House through its procedures and records.
This is a resolution acted on by the House alone and is not sent to the President, so it does not create law. Adoption is done under House procedures (typically by majority vote) and the House enforces the censure through its internal rules.
This House resolution formally censures Representative Al Green for interrupting the President during the March 4, 2025 joint session.
It finds his conduct disrupted proceedings and notes he was removed by the Sergeant at Arms.
The resolution directs Representative Green to present himself in the well for a public reading of the censure by the Speaker.
Narrow, administrable House disciplinary resolution has reasonable chance of adoption by the House but faces partisan uncertainty; it is not a statute.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped administrative action imposing censure with concise, specific directions for immediate execution. It functions primarily as an internal disciplinary measure with a public, symbolic element.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and chilling dissent risks
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and chilling dissent risks
Likely views the censure as an excessive punishment for a protest act and a potential chilling precedent for dissent.
Would still acknowledge that interrupting a joint session breached chamber decorum and required some response.
Will likely accept censure as a reasonable, measured response to a clear breach of decorum while emphasizing consistency.
Concerned about precedent and partisan application, but supportive of accountability for disrupting official proceedings.
Strongly supports the censure as an appropriate enforcement of decorum and authority.
Views the action as necessary to uphold respect for the Presidency and the House's rules.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrable House disciplinary resolution has reasonable chance of adoption by the House but faces partisan uncertainty; it is not a statute.
The House formally adopted this resolution. A resolution applies only to the House and does not require the other chamber's approval or the President's signature — this vote settles the matter.
A resolution is a formal statement of opinion or decision by the chamber.
The tabling attempt failed. The original motion lives on and can be acted on.
Tabling a motion effectively kills it without debate.
Progressives emphasize civil liberties and chilling dissent risks
Narrow, administrable House disciplinary resolution has reasonable chance of adoption by the House but faces partisan uncertainty; it is no…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped administrative action imposing censure with concise, specific directions for immediate execution. It functions primarily as an internal di…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.