H. Res. 196 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of the week beginning March 2, 2025, as "School Social Work Week".

Simple ResolutionEducation|Education
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives support for designating the week beginning March 2, 2025 as School Social Work Week, honors school social workers, and encourages people to observe the week with events that promote awareness. It is a statement of the House's view and does not create binding federal law or change programs. The resolution records recognition and asks for public observance but does not impose legal requirements.

Passage rules

This is a simple resolution introduced in the House and would be adopted only by that chamber; it is not sent to the President and does not have the force of law. It typically needs a majority vote in the House and serves only as the chamber's formal expression of opinion.

This resolution expresses the House’s support for designating the week beginning March 2, 2025, as “School Social Work Week.” It recognizes the role of school social workers, cites their contributions to student mental health and academic success, and encourages Americans to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

The resolution is non‑binding and does not authorize funding or new programs.

Passage0/100

Simple House resolution is nonbinding and cannot become law; adoption by the House is likely but it will not create statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, cites contextual statutes, specifies the date/title, and asks for public observance without creating legal obligations or fiscal commitments.

Contention15/100

Liberals want this to spur funding; conservatives stress local control.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Communities · SchoolsFederal agencies · Schools

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CommunitiesRaises public awareness of school social workers' roles, potentially increasing community support and referrals.
  • Potential benefitMay bolster recruitment and retention by publicly recognizing the profession's contributions and value.
  • SchoolsCould prompt policymakers and funders to prioritize school-based mental health resources and staffing.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesProvides symbolic recognition but does not provide federal funding or create enforceable requirements.
  • Federal agenciesMay raise expectations for expanded services without accompanying state or federal resources to meet them.
  • SchoolsCould divert attention from concrete legislative or budgetary measures needed to expand school mental health services.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals want this to spur funding; conservatives stress local control.
Progressive95%

Generally strongly supportive; views the designation as recognition of essential mental health supports in schools.

Sees it as an opportunity to highlight unmet student needs and advocate for funding and expanded services.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Supportive but pragmatic; sees the resolution as low‑cost recognition of an important school role.

Values the nonbinding nature but wants clarity that this is awareness, not a substitute for targeted policy or funding decisions.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Generally favorable to honoring professionals and preserving school safety roles, but cautious about expanding federal signaling on mental health in schools.

Prefers local control and opposes implied federal mandates or curricular influence.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Simple House resolution is nonbinding and cannot become law; adoption by the House is likely but it will not create statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will formally adopt the resolution
  • If a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals want this to spur funding; conservatives stress local control.

Simple House resolution is nonbinding and cannot become law; adoption by the House is likely but it will not create statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, cites contextual statutes, specifies the date/title, and asks for public observance with…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis