H. Res. 206 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the importance of stepped-up basis under section 1014 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in preserving family-owned farms and small businesses.

Simple ResolutionTaxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Mar 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This House resolution expresses support for retaining the stepped-up basis rule in Internal Revenue Code section 1014. It states that stepped-up basis helps preserve generational transfers of family farms and small businesses, opposes new taxes on those operations, and recognizes the importance of intergenerational business succession.

Why people may split

Progressives view preservation as preserving wealth advantages

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a concise, well-formed symbolic expression that clearly states a position and grounds it with basic factual citations, while appropriately omitting implementation, fiscal, and enforcement detail that would be expected only in substantive legislation.

This House resolution expresses support for retaining the stepped-up basis rule in Internal Revenue Code section 1014.

It states that stepped-up basis helps preserve generational transfers of family farms and small businesses, opposes new taxes on those operations, and recognizes the importance of intergenerational business succession.

The resolution is non‑binding and primarily declaratory in nature.

Passage5/100

As a non-binding House resolution, it does not create law; it is primarily a messaging vehicle with minimal path to statutory effect.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a concise, well-formed symbolic expression that clearly states a position and grounds it with basic factual citations, while appropriately omitting implementation, fiscal, and enforcement detail that would be expected only in substantive legislation.

Contention70/100

Progressives view preservation as preserving wealth advantages

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Families · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • FamiliesReduces immediate capital gains taxes for heirs of farms and family businesses, easing liquidity pressures.
  • Local governmentsLowers risk of forced asset sales, helping maintain farm continuity and local rural employment.
  • Small businessesSimplifies succession planning and lowers administrative and compliance burdens for small business transfers.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesMaintains a tax preference that reduces federal revenue, potentially increasing deficits or shifting tax burdens.
  • Potential burdenDisproportionately benefits heirs with appreciated assets, potentially exacerbating wealth inequality.
  • Potential burdenEncourages holding appreciated assets to avoid taxable realizations, reducing taxable turnover.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives view preservation as preserving wealth advantages
Progressive30%

Likely skeptical of a blanket defense of stepped-up basis because it can shield large, inherited wealth from capital gains taxation.

Supportive of protecting small farms and family businesses, but prefers targeted exceptions rather than preserving the rule universally.

Likely resistant
Centrist65%

Treats the resolution as a narrowly focused, symbolic statement prioritizing stability for family farms and small businesses.

Sees merit in preserving succession tools but wants careful, evidence‑based tax policy and clear definitions of who qualifies.

Split reaction
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable: views the resolution as protecting property rights, family ownership, and rural livelihoods by opposing new taxes on generational transfers.

Sees stepped-up basis as essential for preventing forced sales and preserving small businesses.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

As a non-binding House resolution, it does not create law; it is primarily a messaging vehicle with minimal path to statutory effect.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule a floor vote
  • Breadth of bipartisan support if debated
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives view preservation as preserving wealth advantages

As a non-binding House resolution, it does not create law; it is primarily a messaging vehicle with minimal path to statutory effect.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a concise, well-formed symbolic expression that clearly states a position and grounds it with basic factual citations, while appropriately omitting implement…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis