H. Res. 274 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of the week of April 6 through April 12, 2025, as "National Water Week".

Simple ResolutionEnvironmental Protection|Environmental Protection
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 31, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This House resolution expresses support for designating April 6–12, 2025, as "National Water Week." It lists challenges facing U.S. water systems, including lack of plumbing for some households, aging infrastructure, emerging contaminants, drought, and workforce and supply chain issues. The text emphasizes the value of federal investment, research and development, source control, resiliency, and assistance to disadvantaged, rural, and Tribal communities.

Why people may split

Extent of federal spending and new aid versus local solutions

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it explicitly designates a specific week as 'National Water Week' and provides detailed explanatory 'Whereas' findings without creating legal obligations or authorizations.

This House resolution expresses support for designating April 6–12, 2025, as "National Water Week." It lists challenges facing U.S. water systems, including lack of plumbing for some households, aging infrastructure, emerging contaminants, drought, and workforce and supply chain issues.

The text emphasizes the value of federal investment, research and development, source control, resiliency, and assistance to disadvantaged, rural, and Tribal communities.

The resolution is a non‑binding, symbolic statement rather than an authorization of funding.

Passage0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution that cannot become law; it may be adopted by the House but would not produce statutory change.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it explicitly designates a specific week as 'National Water Week' and provides detailed explanatory 'Whereas' findings without creating legal obligations or authorizations.

Contention20/100

Extent of federal spending and new aid versus local solutions

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness about water infrastructure needs and access disparities nationwide.
  • Local governmentsMay prompt federal, state, and local policymakers to prioritize water funding and programs.
  • Potential benefitHighlights needs of disadvantaged and Tribal communities, potentially guiding equity-focused policies.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThis is a non-binding designation that creates no legal obligations or direct funding.
  • Potential burdenCould raise public expectations without delivering concrete legislative or budgetary commitments.
  • Local governmentsReferences to federal assistance may be viewed as advocating expanded federal roles in local water systems.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Extent of federal spending and new aid versus local solutions
Progressive95%

Likely welcomes the designation as recognition of water justice and infrastructure inequities.

Views the resolution as useful political cover to push for federal funding, stronger protections against contaminants, and equitable investments for disadvantaged communities.

Prefers this statement be followed quickly by concrete funding and regulatory action.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Views the resolution as a broadly sensible, low‑stakes recognition that raises awareness of real infrastructure problems.

Appreciates focus on research, resilience, and disadvantaged communities but wants costed plans and measurable outcomes.

Supports next steps that emphasize accountability and federal‑state coordination.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Likely accepts the symbolic designation but is cautious about language calling for federal investment and regulatory obligations.

Prefers state and local solutions, private-sector involvement, and careful scrutiny of any proposed federal spending.

Concerned about potential regulatory expansion tied to emerging contaminants and procurement constraints.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution that cannot become law; it may be adopted by the House but would not produce statutory change.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership will schedule a floor vote
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Extent of federal spending and new aid versus local solutions

This is a nonbinding House resolution that cannot become law; it may be adopted by the House but would not produce statutory change.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it explicitly designates a specific week as 'National Water Week' and provides detailed explanatory 'Whereas'…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis