H. Res. 295 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing Support for the President's Actions to Safeguard National Security and Eliminate Threats from Foreign Terrorist Organizations.

Simple ResolutionInternational Affairs|International Affairs
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that expresses support for the President's actions and affirms his authority to detain, deport, or restrict noncitizens linked to foreign terrorist organizations; it does not create law or change legal rights. It formally endorses removing those organizations from the United States to protect national security. Because it comes only from the House, it does not require Senate approval or the President's signature and has no binding legal effect.

Passage rules

Simple resolutions are adopted by a single chamber and are non-binding; they are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law.

This House resolution expresses support for the President’s recent measures treating certain transnational criminal groups as foreign terrorist organizations and specially designated global terrorists, cites use of the Alien Enemies Act and two flights that returned noncitizen alleged gang members to El Salvador, and affirms presidential authority to detain, deport, or restrict noncitizens tied to such organizations.

Passage15/100

H.Res is nonbinding and cannot create law; adoption by the House is plausible but enactment as law is not applicable.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a concise, symbolic House resolution that documents specific actions and expresses support for executive measures; it references relevant statutes and events but provides no operational, fiscal, or oversight detail.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize due process and human-rights risks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · StatesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesSupports federal removal of noncitizen FTO members, enabling faster deportation or detention operations.
  • StatesMay deter foreign organized crime groups from targeting the United States.
  • Potential benefitEncourages bilateral law enforcement cooperation, as shown by the El Salvador detention agreement.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRaises due process and habeas corpus concerns for detained or deported noncitizens.
  • Potential burdenInvoking the Alien Enemies Act risks novel legal interpretations and constitutional challenges.
  • Potential burdenTransfers to foreign detention centers raise human rights and treatment concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize due process and human-rights risks
Progressive30%

Skeptical and concerned.

While opposing violent transnational crime, this persona worries the resolution endorses overbroad executive power, weakens due process, and overlooks human rights risks when sending people to detention abroad.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Cautiously supportive of stronger tools to combat violent transnational groups, but wants clearer legal standards, congressional oversight, and protection of due process and foreign policy norms.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Strongly supportive.

Views the resolution as appropriate backing for decisive executive action to remove dangerous noncitizens and protect U.S. territory, law enforcement, and citizens from transnational criminal threats.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood15/100

H.Res is nonbinding and cannot create law; adoption by the House is plausible but enactment as law is not applicable.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Judiciary Committee will schedule or report the resolution
  • Degree of partisan unity or opposition in House floor voting
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize due process and human-rights risks

H.Res is nonbinding and cannot create law; adoption by the House is plausible but enactment as law is not applicable.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a concise, symbolic House resolution that documents specific actions and expresses support for executive measures; it references relevant statutes and ev…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis