H. Res. 3 (119th)Bill Overview

Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee to notify the President of the assembly of the Congress.

Simple ResolutionCongress|CongressCongressional operations and organization
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution authorizes the Speaker to appoint two Members of the House to join a committee from the Senate to formally notify the President that a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication. It is a routine, procedural step at the start of a new Congress to arrange that formal notification. It does not create binding law, change policy, or require the President to act. It only governs who the House will send to make the formal notification.

Passage rules

This is a simple House resolution acted on by the House alone and does not go to the President; it is non-binding and concerns internal congressional procedure. It is routine at the opening of a session to appoint members for the notification of the President.

This House resolution directs the Speaker to appoint a two-member House committee to join a Senate committee to notify the President that a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication.

It is a routine, organizational resolution used at the start of a new Congress.

The measure was agreed to without objection.

Passage95/100

Ceremonial, low-cost, noncontroversial measure with strong historical precedent for quick agreement.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative resolution that clearly and succinctly accomplishes a routine operational task with appropriate, minimal detail.

Contention5/100

Debate limited to procedure and optics, not policy substance

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitPreserves an established constitutional and procedural practice for opening a new Congress.
  • Potential benefitFacilitates timely, formal communication between Congress and the President at session start.
  • Potential benefitSupports orderly congressional operations by clarifying who will perform notification duties.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates no substantive policy benefit while consuming minor staff time and attention.
  • Potential burdenMay be viewed as a largely symbolic act with no measurable effect on public outcomes.
  • Potential burdenCould concentrate selection authority in House leadership when appointing committee members.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Debate limited to procedure and optics, not policy substance
Progressive90%

Seen as a routine, procedural step that enables constitutional communication between branches.

Supportive of institutional functioning but may note the lack of explicit bipartisan appointment requirements.

Views it as having negligible policy impact.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

A pragmatic, low-stakes organizational resolution that facilitates Congress beginning its business.

Generally supportive, provided it proceeds efficiently and does not become a partisan stunt.

Sees limited downside or fiscal impact.

Leans supportive
Conservative98%

A standard House housekeeping resolution that rightly lets the Speaker appoint the House's representatives.

Viewed as noncontroversial and necessary for institutional functioning.

Little reason to oppose it.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood95/100

Ceremonial, low-cost, noncontroversial measure with strong historical precedent for quick agreement.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate provided (though none expected).
  • Potential procedural timing conflicts between chambers.
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Debate limited to procedure and optics, not policy substance

Ceremonial, low-cost, noncontroversial measure with strong historical precedent for quick agreement.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative resolution that clearly and succinctly accomplishes a routine operational task with appropriate, minimal detail.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis