H. Res. 301 (119th)Bill Overview

Honoring the life and celebrating the birthday of Ulysses S. Grant, America's 18th President and native son of Ohio's Second Congressional District.

Simple ResolutionArmed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Unknown
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that honors Ulysses S. Grant and recognizes his contributions; it does not create law or require the President's approval. It expresses the views and sentiments of the House of Representatives, used to commemorate people and events. It has effect only within the House and does not have the force of law outside the chamber.

This House resolution honors Ulysses S.

Grant on his 203rd birthday and recognizes his role as the Union general who became the 18th President.

It praises his military leadership, notes Reconstruction and civil rights actions, and commends Land of US Grant, Inc. for preserving his Ohio sites.

Passage2/100

As a House‑only, nonbinding resolution it can pass the House easily but does not become law; therefore virtually no chance of becoming law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate, limited declarative language without attempting regulatory, fiscal, or operational changes.

Contention10/100

Liberal emphasizes civil rights legacy and wants broader Reconstruction context

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides formal federal recognition of Ulysses S. Grant's historical contributions and civil rights efforts.
  • Potential benefitMay increase public awareness and educational interest in Grant's life and Reconstruction history.
  • Local governmentsCould boost local tourism to Georgetown heritage sites, potentially increasing visitor spending.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely ceremonial and creates no funding, legal, or regulatory changes.
  • Potential burdenUses legislative time for symbolic recognition rather than substantive policy action.
  • Potential burdenMay be criticized for omitting complex or controversial aspects of Grant's presidency.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes civil rights legacy and wants broader Reconstruction context
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because the resolution highlights Grant’s role in preserving the Union and advancing civil rights during Reconstruction.

Appreciates recognition of local preservation efforts but may wish the text emphasized broader racial justice legacies and Reconstruction complexities.

Leans supportive
Centrist100%

Generally supportive; views the resolution as a routine, nonbinding commemoration of a historical figure and local organization.

May note it is largely symbolic and prefer efficient use of floor time and clear historical accuracy.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supportive because it honors Union victory, military service, and a U.S. President from Ohio.

Appreciates emphasis on leadership and local heritage, though some may prefer focus on military accomplishments over Reconstruction policies.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

As a House‑only, nonbinding resolution it can pass the House easily but does not become law; therefore virtually no chance of becoming law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Committee referral could delay or table the resolution
  • Any contested historical interpretation could provoke objections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes civil rights legacy and wants broader Reconstruction context

As a House‑only, nonbinding resolution it can pass the House easily but does not become law; therefore virtually no chance of becoming law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate, limited declarative language without attempting regulatory,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis