H. Res. 306 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the 60th anniversary of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Simple ResolutionScience, Technology, Communications|Science, Technology, Communications
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House-only statement that congratulates and recognizes the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory on its 60th anniversary. It simply expresses the sentiment of the House and highlights the lab's accomplishments. It does not create any legal rights, change policy, or require action by the executive branch.

Passage rules

This is a simple resolution acted on by the House of Representatives alone; it is not sent to the President and does not have the force of law.

This House resolution recognizes the 60th anniversary of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).

It recounts PNNL’s founding at the Hanford site in 1965, notes growth in staff and R&D spending, and lists contributions in areas like nuclear cleanup, energy, Earth systems, national security, and STEM outreach.

The resolution congratulates PNNL, recognizes its contributions, and expresses support for continued scientific work.

Passage0/100

House simple resolutions are non-binding expressions and do not become law; ceremonial intent means zero chance of becoming statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses standard operative language to congratulate and recognize the institution; it does not attempt to create rights, duties, funding, or procedural changes.

Contention20/100

Left emphasizes environmental justice and worker protections

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · StudentsCommunities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national visibility of PNNL, potentially aiding future funding and partnerships.
  • Local governmentsAffirms contributions to regional jobs and economic activity, supporting local workforce and suppliers.
  • StudentsHighlights scientific achievements, bolstering recruitment and retention of researchers and students.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenProvides only symbolic recognition and creates no binding funding or policy changes.
  • CommunitiesMay gloss over ongoing environmental cleanup risks and community concerns at Hanford site.
  • Potential burdenCelebration of security technologies could raise civil liberties and surveillance concerns among critics.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes environmental justice and worker protections
Progressive90%

Generally supportive and proud of public investment in scientific research, workforce development, and environmental cleanup.

Sees the resolution as a positive affirmation of public science but would like stronger language on environmental justice, climate action, and labor conditions.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Views the resolution as largely symbolic and noncontroversial, appropriately recognizing a long-standing federal research institution.

Supports the lab’s economic and scientific contributions while wanting clear accountability and cost-effectiveness tied to federal support.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive of recognizing a major employer and national-security research asset, but attentive to fiscal discipline and private-sector competition.

Views symbolic praise favorably if the lab’s work aligns with security and economic returns, but wary of expanded federal missions.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolutions are non-binding expressions and do not become law; ceremonial intent means zero chance of becoming statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule the resolution for floor consideration
  • If any Member objects to unanimous consent or voice adoption
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes environmental justice and worker protections

House simple resolutions are non-binding expressions and do not become law; ceremonial intent means zero chance of becoming statute.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses standard operative language to congratulate and recognize the institution; it d…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis