H. Res. 311 (119th)Bill Overview

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of Representative from the Thirtieth Congressional District of Texas.

Simple ResolutionCongress|CongressCongressional elections
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 19.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution directs the House of Representatives to dismiss an election contest about the Representative from Texas's 30th District because the contest was filed too late. It is an internal House action deciding how the House will handle a specific contested election and does not create or change federal law. The dismissal ends the House's formal consideration of that particular challenge.

Passage rules

This is a simple House resolution that only requires action by the House of Representatives; it is not considered or voted on by the Senate or presented to the President, and it governs only the House's internal proceedings.

This House resolution dismisses the election contest for the office of Representative from Texas’s 30th Congressional District on the stated grounds that the contest was filed untimely with the House of Representatives.

Passage0/100

This is a House procedural resolution, not a statute; it can be adopted by the House but does not become law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type (an internal administrative House action dismissing an election contest), the resolution is concise and clear in purpose and effect. It provides an adequate, proportionate mechanism and implementation path for a one-off procedural disposition.

Contention30/100

Left stresses voter access and risk of blocking valid claims

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides finality to the contested House election, ending congressional consideration of the challenge.
  • Potential benefitReduces administrative workload and delays associated with conducting a House election contest.
  • Potential benefitPreserves House rules and deadlines by enforcing timeliness requirements for filing election contests.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenPrevents review of alleged irregularities by dismissing the contest without addressing substantive claims.
  • Potential burdenMay leave constituents feeling their allegations were unaddressed, potentially reducing confidence in oversight.
  • Potential burdenCreates a precedent prioritizing procedural timeliness over substantive examination of contested election claims.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left stresses voter access and risk of blocking valid claims
Progressive50%

This persona will view the resolution as a procedural enforcement of House rules but also worry about access to remedies for voters.

They will be cautious that technical dismissals do not hide substantive election problems.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

A centrist will see this as an understandable application of procedural rules to maintain orderly business.

They will emphasize transparent, consistent application of deadlines while noting exceptions should be narrowly defined.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

This persona will generally approve dismissal as enforcement of procedural rules and protecting finality of elections.

They will emphasize avoiding frivolous or delayed challenges that disrupt governance.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a House procedural resolution, not a statute; it can be adopted by the House but does not become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the contesting party will raise procedural objections
  • Possible motions or floor amendments that could delay adoption
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left stresses voter access and risk of blocking valid claims

This is a House procedural resolution, not a statute; it can be adopted by the House but does not become law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type (an internal administrative House action dismissing an election contest), the resolution is concise and clear in purpose and effect. It provides an adequate, proportionate mecha…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis